#768) Kannapolis, N.C. (1941)

#768) Kannapolis, N.C. (1941)

OR “Cannon Films”

Filmed by H. Lee Waters

Class of 2004

The Plot: From 1936 to 1942, photographer H. Lee Waters traveled across the Carolinas (plus briefly to Virginia and Tennessee) to film his “Movies of Local People” series. The series was exactly what it sounds like: footage of the people in a local town, screened at their local movie theater, giving these ordinary people the rare opportunity to see themselves on the big screen. Of the hundreds of communities Waters documented in his series, the NFR selected “Kannapolis, N.C.” to represent his work. Spread out over three reels totaling over two hours of footage, “Kannapolis” highlights the people and communities of this suburb of North Carolina’s Charlotte metropolitan area, including extensive footage of its Black neighborhood.

Why It Matters: The NFR gives a run-down of the kind of “town portrait” this film represents, and mentions H. Lee Waters “slyly” including plenty of kids in his films to increase theater attendance.

But Does It Really?: Although I recently expressed some “home movie fatigue” on this blog, I’m happy I was able to rally for “Kannapolis, N.C.” Obviously something like “Kannapolis” was never meant to be analyzed over 80 years later as a historical document, but Waters’ footage paints a warm portrait of a small town in a way that only film can. We not only see what people looked like back then, but how they behaved and interacted with each other. “Kannapolis” is on the NFR not only to represent the hundreds of films made by H. Lee Waters, but also to preserve this loving documentation of a bygone era.

Shout Outs: Reel 2 opens with a family posing next to a cardboard cutout of Popeye…for some reason. 

Everybody Gets One: Herbert Lee Waters made his living as a studio photographer in Lexington, North Carolina, operating the same studio on Main Street for over 60 years. In 1936, needing additional income for his family in the midst of the Depression, Waters took his 16mm camera and projector and started a six year journey across four states to film his “Movies of Local People” series. Waters would film people and events in these communities, and screen them at the town’s movie theater before the main feature, earning a cut of ticket sales as well as contributions from local businesses who bought advertising space within the films. In total, Waters visited 118 communities and produced over 250 films. And for the record, Waters would only travel to these communities during the week, always coming home to Lexington on the weekends to be with his wife and children.

Wow, That’s Dated: The local business highlighted throughout “Kannapolis, N.C.” is Montgomery Ward, the largest U.S. retail store at the time. Although the company ceased operation in 2001, it was revived in 2004 and still exists solely as an online retailer.

Other notes 

  • Like many towns of the era, Kannapolis began life as a mill village for a nearby textile factory, in this case the Cannon Mills Company, which at one point was the world’s largest manufacturer of towels and bed sheets. Originally dubbed Cannon City by the townspeople, the name Cannapolis caught on, and by 1906 was adopted as the official name (though Cannon Mills founder J. W. Cannon insisted on it being spelled with a K to differentiate it from his company’s other mill town in nearby Concord).
  • About halfway through his travels, Waters had made enough money to occasionally film in color! Reel 1 of “Kannapolis, N.C.” is filmed in glorious Kodachrome, which for our purposes here really enriches the viewing experience. Commercial use color film was still a rarity in the early 1940s, and I’m sure Waters’ color footage went over like gangbusters at many a local screening. 
  • A majority of the “Kannapolis” footage is of local children, which as suggested by the NFR write-up was strategic on Waters’ part to get families at his screenings: why sell one movie ticket when you can sell four or more? Children playing games and behaving naturally is a staple of several amateur films in the NFR, and “Kannapolis” is no exception. We even get some shots of teenage girls playing baseball, which given the ‘40s setting has a very “League of Their Own” vibe to it.
  • Yes, two hours of silent amateur footage with no plot is a lot to sit through, but compared to five hours of the “Bohulano Family Film Collection” and seven hours of the “Solomon Sir Jones Films”, this was a piece of cake. The nice thing about having this much footage is that you get a much more realistic sense of how people behaved back then. There’s a point where you stop posing/mugging for the camera and start to act more naturally.
  • If any of the kids in this movie are still alive, they would be in their 90s today.
  • With its charming look at children in a Southern town, “Kannapolis” is reminiscent of another Depression-era film series in the NFR: “The Kidnappers Foil”. Granted “Kannapolis” lacks the sheer entertainment value of “Kidnappers”, but then again what movie doesn’t by comparison?
  • The Kannapolis Montgomery Ward store really got their money’s worth, with Waters extensively featuring their showrooms and products. You can get a skirt for 49 cents (about $11 today)!
  • A trademark of the “Movies of Local People” series was Waters’ experimental shots, including reverse film (achieved by placing the camera upside down and then splicing the film back into the reel right-side up). The reverse shots are typically reserved for kids jumping off of small ledges or mounds, making them appear to fly up in the air. We also get some fun timelapse shots, including one of cars driving on Main Street that looks like the ‘40s prequel to “Koyaanisqatsi”. 
  • We’re also treated to an unintentional color remake of “Employees Leaving the Lumière Factory”, with footage of employees leaving what I assume is the Cannon Mills factory. As best I can tell, no one is smuggling towels out of the building. I guess that’s more of a hotel thing. 
  • Reels 2 & 3 are in black and white, which definitely changes the viewing experience. What started as a feeling of being transported to time and place now feels more removed. The black and white mixed with the rural setting gives everything a Dust Bowl vibe. It’s like a more upbeat “The Last Picture Show”.
  • We are treated to a Randolph Scott double feature in this film. At different points the marquee of the Gem Theatre is promoting screenings of Scott’s 1940 film “When the Daltons Rode” with Brian Donlevy and 1941’s “Belle Starr” with Gene Tierney. Side note: As of this writing the Gem Theatre is still in operation, albeit the rebuilt theater after the original was destroyed in a fire shortly after the filming of “Kannapolis”.
  • In 1941, Kannapolis had a population of roughly 8500 people, and I think Waters was determined to film every single person. Throughout the film Waters sprinkles in quick montages of different people smiling for the camera (though I appreciate how many pedestrians look at the camera with an appropriate amount of skepticism). There’s also a point where I’m pretty sure we get repeat shots of the same kids from earlier.
  • The most interesting moment in the film for me was a group of school children at a flag raising ceremony (with 48 stars), in which the children give the flag the Bellamy salute. This was the common flag salute of the time, in which the arm is extended upwards with the palm down, followed by the palm being turned upwards; that last move being the only differentiation between the Bellamy salute and another infinitely more famous upward arm salute. The Bellamy salute was officially removed as part of the Pledge of Allegiance by Congress in 1942 for obvious reasons.
  • Reel 3 begins by treading the same water as the previous two reels (kids posing for the camera, etc.), but then we get something that has only appeared sporadically in this film so far: people of color. The footage of Kannapolis’s Black neighborhood is very similar to the footage of the White neighborhoods, with children playing and families with friendly smiles. There’s a whole conversation that could happen here regarding the effects of segregation in these towns, but that’s a much bigger can of worms than can be opened up here, but important to acknowledge nevertheless
  • With a runtime of over two hours, I assume these three reels weren’t shown together in one screening. That’s just too much time to sit through footage of your friends and neighbors before your main feature. We want to see “Western Union” or “Paris Calling”!

Legacy 

  • Following his “Movies of Local People” series, Waters returned home to his family in Lexington and continued operating his photography studio. Towards the end of his life, Waters began donating his films and related documents to Duke University, where they are still held and preserved. H. Lee Waters died in 1997 at age 95.
  • Kannapolis continued being primarily a textile town until the closing of the Cannon factory in 2003. The former factory site is now the home of the North Carolina Research Campus, one of the leading medical research centers in the country.
  • Notable people born in Kannapolis include funk singer George Clinton, and NASCAR legends Dale Earnhardt Sr. & Jr. (along with several other members of the Earnhardt family). Fun Fact: George Clinton was born the year “Kannapolis N.C.” was filmed, so one of those babies may be George in his NFR debut (and if not, he still has “House Party”).
  • Side note: Shortly after viewing this film, I actually drove through Kannapolis! Granted, I stayed on I-85 the whole time, so I didn’t spend any real time in Kannapolis, but I was there. My main takeaway was that every billboard was either for a personal injury firm or a Cracker Barrel. What is going on over there?

Further Viewing: The Cameraman Has Visited Our Town”, a 1989 documentary short by Tom Whiteside about H. Lee Waters and his films, including footage from many of the “Local People” series, plus an interview with Waters himself! A fascinating watch, although five minutes of the short is our narrator listing off every community Waters filmed. “Albemarle…Angier…Apex…Asheboro…Belmont…”

“…Wadesboro…Wake Forest…Warrenton…Winston-Salem. In South Carolina: Blacksburg… Bishopville…Camden…”

#767) Hours for Jerome – Parts 1 & 2 (1982)

#767) Hours for Jerome – Parts 1 & 2 (1982)

OR “A Man for All Seasons”

Directed by Nathaniel Dorsky

Class of 2012

Okay, so here’s the deal with “Hours for Jerome”: Filmmaker Nathaniel Dorsky has remained adamant that “Hours” only be viewed on film in a theater at its proper frame rate, and that the film never be digitally uploaded anywhere. This, of course, makes viewing “Hours” very difficult for anyone unable to attend a screening, making it one of the hardest NFR movies to cross off your list. Despite Mr. Dorsky’s wishes, the film has recently made its way online. After some initial hesitation, I gave in and watched the film’s digital upload. Out of respect for Nathaniel Dorsky, I will not be including the link to where I found the film, and I encourage you to see “Hours” as intended at an official screening. Check out more information at Nathaniel Dorsky’s official website.

Mr. Dorsky, on the off chance you’re reading this, please excuse me. Or don’t, I can’t tell you what to do.

The Plot: Experimental filmmaker Nathaniel Dorsky turns his Bolex camera on his partner Jerome Hiler in “Hours for Jerome”. Filmed in both Manhattan and Lake Owassa, New Jersey (where Dorsky and Hiler lived at the time), “Hours” is akin to a moving photo album; a seemingly random montage of the people, places, and special occasions that make up Jerome’s life, with Nathaniel experimenting with time-lapse footage and assorted lenses. Both parts clock in at about 20 minutes: Part 1 focusing on life during spring and summer, Part 2 on fall and winter.

Why It Matters: The NFR write-up is primarily a rehash of Nathaniel Dorsky and his filmmaking technique. The film itself is described as his “personal devotional” that is “an arrangement of images, energies and illuminations.”

But Does It Really?: Despite not watching the film as its creator intended, I liked “Hours for Jerome”. The film is a vacation to time and space, a “simpler” time when we weren’t recording everything 24/7. Dorsky successfully balances the familiar and unfamiliar, taking what is seemingly someone’s home movies and throwing in enough experimental elements to keep things interesting. I can give “Hours for Jerome” a pass in the NFR for representing Nathaniel Dorsky’s extensive filmography, as well as his (god willing) generous forgiveness towards those of us who watched this film online.

Everybody Gets One: Nathaniel Dorsky first dipped his toe into filmmaking growing up in Milburn, New Jersey, filming nature shorts inspired by the “True Life Adventures” series. While studying film at NYU, Dorsky joined the local experimental film scene at the Film-Makers’ Cooperative, where he met fellow filmmaker and his future partner, Jerome Hiler. The couple moved to Lake Owassa, New Jersey in 1966, where Dorsky filmed footage of Jerome and their home life from 1966 through 1970. After a move to San Francisco and a sabbatical from filmmaking for most of the 1970s, Dorsky began editing the Lake Owassa/Manhattan footage in 1980, completing “Hours of Jerome” in 1982.

Title Track: The title is a reference to “Book of Hours”, defined by the NFR listing as “a medieval series of devotional prayers recited at eight-hour intervals throughout the day.” Side Note: In my tangent rabbit hole on prayer research, I learned there is a St. Jerome who, appropriately enough for our purposes here, is the patron saint of libraries and librarians. Blessed St. Jerome, please watch over Dr. Carla Hayden, and let her successor be someone who has actually stepped foot inside a library before. 

Seriously, Oscars?: No Oscar love for “Jerome” or any of Nathaniel Dorsky’s filmography, though in 1968 he won an Emmy as the art photographer of the CBS News documentary “Gauguin in Tahiti: The Search for Paradise”.

Other notes 

  • Like many of Dorsky’s films, “Hours for Jerome” was shot on a 16mm Bolex camera. Dorsky’s films are silent, meaning they can be projected at a rate of 18 frames per second (as opposed to sound film’s 24 frames per second). Dorsky insists that his films be screened at 18 fps because it makes the image appear more abstract, something that gets lost in digital translation.
  • I watched this not too long after my viewing of “Koyaanisqatsi”, and there’s definitely a connection between these two films: lots of nature shots and experimental timelapse photography with seemingly no rhyme or reason. In fact, this post was very close to being subtitled “Boyaanisqatsi”, but I figured I’ve insulted Mr. Dorsky enough already.
  • Another NFR movie this film reminded me of was Andy Warhol’s “Empire”, except Dorsky only films the Empire State Building for a few fleeting shots and it’s not a fan-made recreation I duped myself into watching. Yes, I’m still bitter about that almost five years later.
  • Interesting to see night shots before cameras could really do night shots. Either Nathaniel films lightning striking around Manhattan during a summer storm or he’s just futzing with his lighting equipment. 
  • Speaking of Manhattan: Hey, there’s a couple shots where Nathaniel’s peepin’ on his neighbors! Ethics and consent issues aside, this is pretty much the only way you can get people to behave naturally on-camera, giving us in the audience a taste of the voyeuristic qualities you need to be an effective filmmaker.
  • Having recently moved to the east coast, this film is serving as my primer for seasons. I’ve heard of this “autumn” you speak of, but have never actually witnessed it; same goes for a winter with accumulated snow. We’ll see how this California boy handles all of that.
  • There’s only so much I can say about “Hours for Jerome” without it becoming a repetitive listing of “that shot was cool”, “hey, look at that”, etc. While I still feel a tinge guilty about how I viewed the film, I enjoyed “Hours” for what it was: observances and documentation of Nathaniel and Jerome’s life together. (Also, I will point out that I’m watching a majority of these films in a way their filmmakers did not intend; no matter how big my TV is it still isn’t a movie screen.) Despite Mr. Dorsky’s wishes, I still feel I experienced “Hours’ rather than simply watched it. I appreciated the quiet contemplation I was allowed while watching “Hours”, particularly my realization that when it comes to filmmaking, life is interesting enough by itself. Just point a camera and let it happen around you.

Legacy 

  • As of this writing, both Nathaniel Dorsky and Jerome Hiler are still making films:  Dorsky most recently completed a series called “Dreams Reveal a Weightless World”, and Hiler completed “Careless Passage” just last year. One noteworthy entry in Dorsky’s filmography is his “Arboretum Cycle” in 2017, filmed at the San Francisco Botanical Garden. Let the record show that I lived within walking distance of the Botanical Garden in 2017, and am only now learning about these films following my cross-country move. I will forever be kicking myself.
  • Once again, be sure to check out Nathaniel Dorsky’s official website and see if “Hours for Jerome” or any of his other films are screening near you.

NFR 2000: Say My Name

December 27th, 2000: The National Film Registry makes it an even 300 with 25 more movies. Almost a full quarter century later, I’ve covered all of them on this blog. Here’s my recap of the NFR inductees (sung a la Conan O’Brien) “in the year 2000…”:

Other notes

  • The Class of 2000 is a very eclectic group of movies. We continue to see a diminish in the number of iconic classics being inducted and an uptick in more obscure entries. Plus we see the beginning of the “What’s not on the list yet” NFR trend of the 2000s, with another Universal monster movie, a Ranown western, a Disney True-Life Adventure, an Andy Hardy movie, a Porky Pig cartoon, a blaxploitation movie, and even a snipe. And “Multiple SIDosis” is the first of many amateur films that will be inducted over the next decade.
  • As for my own writing, I’m mixed on the Class of 2000. There’s a few indisputable heavy hitters in this group, but overall my opinion of these movies’ NFR inclusion ranges from skeptical to downright hostile (in hindsight I regret my negative comments toward the NEA in the “Sherman’s March” post. I thought we had more time!). Even the movies I can justify seem to only make the cut due to a specific element within the film (typically an iconic central performance). And as always, re-reading my writing over the last eight years is an interesting look at my evolution as a writer, with enough topical references to pinpoint exactly when these were written (for crying out loud, there’s an “inauguration crowd size” joke in one of these!).
  • The NFR press release doesn’t give me as much historical context as it has in years past. No big news regarding any changes at the Library of Congress, just a rundown of the films and a call for film preservation (two of this year’s silent entries were presumed lost and rediscovered). One interesting note is that the press release calls the 1924 “Peter Pan” “the classic children’s tale in its definitive film version.” Suck it, 1953 Disney version!
  • To the best of my knowledge, given current events in late 2000 Washington D.C., no recount was requested for the final list of NFR inductees, and the Supreme Court did not intervene. There’s no mention of the 2000 presidential election in the NFR press release, though I suspect some voters were still “mad as hell” and “not going to take it anymore”.
  • When the Class of 2000 was announced, “Cast Away” was number one at the U.S. box office. As of this writing no films playing in December 2000 have made the NFR, but I wouldn’t be surprised if “Cast Away” or “Meet the Parents” ever make the list. That being said, the most iconic film in theaters at the time was “Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon”, which was primarily a Taiwanese production and therefore ineligible…or is it?
  • Fun Fact: “Why We Fight” is the longest I’ve taken to write a single post: almost two months! (“Solomon Sir Jones” took two years, but that included a very long hiatus) Conversely, I watched, researched, and wrote the post for fellow 2000 inductee “Let’s All Go to the Lobby” in under an hour.
  • We only have a few double-dippers this time around: actors Robert Duvall and Judy Garland, and cinematographer Tony Gaudio. In a stretch I’ll include Francis Ford Coppola, “Apocalypse Now” director and “Koyaanisqatsi” presenter.
  • Thematic double dips: Big spooky houses, inside baseball showbiz, gangsters struggling to reform, child endangerment, short stories with lots of padding, ‘70s New York, protagonists gunned down at the end, manipulative documentaries, kick-ass title songs, lingering shots of the desert, stars before they were famous, and as always, the director’s deeply troubled issues with women. And because I refuse to end on that downer note, at least four of these movies are on my “Die Hard Not-Christmas” list!
  • Favorite of My Own Subtitles: Content Dictates Reform, Baptism By Ire, Pardon the Expressionism, Disney Arizona Adventure, This Prodigy is Condemned, Stop! Or This Mother Will Shoot, and Waiting for Brando (emphasis on the second syllable of “Brando”). Honorable mention to my “Land Beyond the Sunset” subtitle: “Duh-nuh Duh-nuh Nuh, Fresh Air! Duh-nuh, Duh-nuh Nuh, Child Scare!”. It’s a stretch, but for some reason I love sneaking in “Green Acres” references on this blog. I don’t even recall watching reruns of “Green Acres” that much growing up.
  • And finally, special shout-out to my “A Star is Born” post, which includes one of my favorite things I’ve ever written:

“Movies are moments. Our memories of films erode to one or two moments: a scene, a line, a performance, etc. Few movies are perfect from beginning to end, but many have at least one of those perfect moments captured on film.” 

That pretty much sums up what we’re doing here, doesn’t it?

Okay, now I’ve covered every NFR entry from the 20th century. Happy? Up next: 2001: An NFR Odyssey. Happy viewing, and keep taking care of each other.

Tony

#766) Koyaanisqatsi (1982)

#766) Koyaanisqatsi (1982)

OR 

(c) Life Magazine

Seriously, this is the photo the director wanted to name this film instead of a word. More on this later.

Directed by Godfrey Reggio

Written by Reggio, Ron Fricke, Michael Hoenig, and Alton Walpole

Class of 2000

The Plot: The hardest thing I’ll ever have to write for this blog is a description of “Koyaanisqatsi”. The film is 86 minutes of wordless footage presented without context or narration, set to an invigorating Philip Glass score. The film begins with footage of the natural world, but quickly pivots to mankind destroying nature to create cities and skyscrapers. Through time-lapse, slow-motion, and any other camera trick you can think of, we witness humans in big American cities…existing: driving on the freeway, walking down a busy street, eating lunch, or simply looking into the camera. Director Godfrey Reggio purposefully avoids telling you what to take away from this movie, other than the translation of this film’s title: a Hopi word meaning “a crazy life”, “life in turmoil”, “life out of balance”, “life disintegrating”, and “a state of life that calls for another way of living”.

Why It Matters: The NFR calls the film “so lyrically unusual that it nearly defies description.” The write-up salutes director Reggio and composer Glass, and makes comparisons to fellow NFR entries “Manhatta” and “A Bronx Morning”.

But Does It Really?: While it took me a minute to get into “Koyaanisqatsi”, ultimately I dug it. We as humans are designed to search for patterns, and this is the ultimate pattern-finding movie. Each shot is so well composed and each visual so striking that it must mean something. My personal take was that this is a film about human destruction, of land and of ourselves. We are the life out of balance, and the film’s suggestion of our unsustainable world has only been proven more and more prescient in the last 40 years. “Koyaanisqatsi” may hit the “aesthetic significance” part of the NFR requisite harder than any other movie on the list, leaving an indelible influence on American filmmaking. 

Everybody Gets One: Godfrey Reggio’s filmmaking style makes a lot more sense once you learn that he spent 14 years taking a vow of silence training with the Catholic Christian Brotherhood. After becoming disillusioned with the monks, he focused on social activism, and was inspired to try filmmaking after seeing Luis Buñuel’s “Los Olvidados” (another “yeah, that scans” moment in my research). In the ‘70s he founded the Institute for Regional Education and collaborated with the ACLU on a public interest campaign about the invasion of privacy. During this production, Reggio met with cinematographer Ron Fricke, and the two started collaborating on a film after the campaign ended. Over the course of four years (with a few stops and starts when money ran out), Reggio and Fricke filmed anything and everything across 14 different states “without regard for message or political content.” 

Wow, That’s Dated: The modern city footage is a lovely slice of ‘80s corporate America, right before digital technology and home computers changed everything. And like the rest of America in the early ‘80s, “Koyaanisqatsi” has Pac-Man Fever! (Ms. Pac-Man to be specific).

Title Track: Godfrey Reggio didn’t want to give the film a title to avoid influencing anyone’s viewing experience, proposing the title be an image, specifically the J. R. Eyerman photo from Life magazine posted above. Once Reggio was told the title needed to be a word, he chose koyaanisqatsi because it “had no baggage culturally”. In perhaps the oddest title song we’ll ever get on this blog, the word koyaanisqatsi is sung throughout the movie by the Philip Glass Ensemble, with soloist Albert de Ruiter hitting those low, guttural notes. Side note: Although the Eyerman photo wasn’t used, there is a shot in the final film of an audience in a movie theater that is set up almost identically to that photo.

Seriously, Oscars?: There were a few critics organizations that gave “Koyaanisqatsi” prizes for Best Documentary or Best Score, but the film received zero recognition from the Academy. As of this writing, Philip Glass has gone 0 for 3 with his subsequent score nominations, and Godfrey Reggio has never been nominated. For the record: the 1983 Oscars gave Best Documentary Feature to Emile Ardolino’s “He Makes Me Feel Like Dancin’”. 

Other notes 

  • The film opens with the text “Francis Ford Coppola presents”. Coppola saw an early cut of the film and offered to put his name on it as a presenter to help sell the film to distributors. I’m not quite sure the extent of Coppola’s other contributions, but apparently the cave painting bookends were his idea. The cave paintings are from Horseshoe Canyon in Utah, and I will argue they set up the destruction theme from the start (they may be beautiful, but it’s still a debasement of nature). This is followed by slow-motion footage of a rocket launch; at least I hope that’s slow-motion, otherwise that rocket is never getting off the ground.
  • Philip Glass had already been composing for orchestras, operas, theater, and even a few episodes of “Sesame Street” when he composed the score for “Koyaanisqatsi”. Glass is one of those composers whose style is so distinct and original that I can only describe this score as very…Philip Glass. Serving as the film’s only soundtrack, Glass’ score threads the needle of creating an emotional impact without dictating how the audience should feel. No easy task, and the result turns an already memorable film into an unforgettable one.
  • Admittedly it took me a bit to get into this film. As I watched shot after shot of canyons, dunes, bat caves, and countless other representation of the four elements, I started to wonder if I was missing something. Was I supposed to get high before watching this? Once I stopped overthinking things and met the film where it was, things started to click. I particularly enjoyed the time lapse of clouds mixed with slow motion ocean waves. I see the correlation.
  • After the film’s first movement, we proceed to my destruction thesis with nature being destroyed to make way for power plants, electrical infrastructure, and other manmade ways to harness our natural resources for our own use. We also get our first sightings of people, seen here relaxing on a beach located right next to a power plant.
  • Guests of “Koyaanisqatsi” fly United Airlines! You’re flying the Friendly Skies! It’s very telling when all I see is a plane on a runway near a congested freeway and I immediately think “That must be LAX”. And I was right!
  • As we move into the big cities I can see the “Manhatta” comparisons with the overhead shots of New York City skyscrapers. Shout out to Hillary Harris, whose 1975 film “Organism” similarly chronicled human behavior within the confines of Lower Manhattan, and got her hired as an additional cinematographer for this film’s New York sequences.
  • What is it about human nature that we enjoy watching stuff blow up? I’m trying to focus on this movie’s themes and find myself distracted by its “When Buildings Collapse” segment. There is something oddly profound about watching something get destroyed.
  • Tonight on “What’s Playing on Broadway Back Now”: Christopher Reeve in the Lanford Wilson play “Fifth of July”, which puts that shot’s production somewhere in fall 1980/winter 1981.
  • In a weird way, I found a lot of the big city footage as beautiful as anything from the nature opening. Part of that is the shot compositions and film processing, which gives everything this attractive green glow, but part of that is also just watching things be. Those time-lapse shots of the freeway are gorgeous to watch, with the quick stop and start of blurry headlights evocative of fireflies. It’s like a dance.
  • Speaking of compositions: This is the only movie I can think of where every shot could double as the movie’s DVD main menu loop.
  • I like when this movie becomes an (un)intentional social experiment. It’s fascinating how many people will opt for the revolving doors when there is a perfectly functional manual door right next to them.
  • Having recently moved out of the Bay Area, I was delighted to see footage of downtown San Francisco. There’s a couple shots of people entering a BART station (side note: those automatic turnstiles were only recently updated before I left) and we even get a time lapse ride along the Embarcadero Freeway, which was damaged in the 1989 earthquake and subsequently demolished. Ah, San Francisco, you were so beautiful before the techies moved in.
  • My destruction thesis continues to be supported through the end of the movie, with EMTs and firefighters navigating busy city streets, and an extended shot of a rocket launching and exploding, perhaps the “container of ashes” that will fall from the sky according to the Hopi prophecy in the end credits.
  • There’s a cacophony of TV soundbites during the end credits, and while hard to decipher, I definitely heard the “Price is Right” ding-ding-ding sound effect when you correctly guess a product’s retail value. If they had thrown in the “losing horn” music cue this movie would have been flawless.

Legacy 

  • Following a nearly three year-long post-production, “Koyaanisqatsi” played at the Telluride and New York film festivals in late 1982. Despite several distribution offers from larger studios, Godfrey Reggio opted to work with newer company Island Alive so that he could maintain artistic input in the film’s distribution. “Koyaanisqatsi” began its theatrical run in San Francisco in April 1983, and routinely broke box office records wherever it played. The film was well received by critics, and was the highest grossing documentary of the 1980s until being surpassed at the last minute by Michael Moore’s “Roger & Me”.
  • This film has two sequels! The “Qatsi” trilogy continued in 1988 with “Powaqqatsi” (roughly translated to “life in transition”) which focused on third world countries, and in 2002 with “Naqoyqatsi” (“life of war”) about the ways technology corrupts community. 
  • Outside of the Qatsi trilogy, Godfrey Reggio manages about one new film a decade. His most recent is 2023’s “Once Within a Time”, applying his experimental lens and global cautionary tales to the fantasy genre (though I get the feeling even that description is too limiting to the film).
  • Though not his first film score, Philip Glass started to gain more recognition as a film composer thanks to “Koyaanisqatsi”. Glass would go on to score Godfrey Reggio’s subsequent films, as well as the films of Errol Morris and my personal favorite of his scores, Peter Weir’s “The Truman Show” (co-created with Burkhard Dallwitz and Wojciech Kilar).
  • “Koyaanisqatsi” is one of those movies that people emulate without knowing it. Whenever you see artfully staged time-lapse footage with a minimalist yet sweeping score, odds are it can be traced back to “Koyaanisqatsi”. Perhaps the last bit of media I expected to include a “Koyaanisqatsi” reference is the trailer for “Grand Theft Auto IV”! 

#765) The Tall T (1957)

#765) The Tall T (1957)

OR “Best Budd’s”

Directed by Budd Boetticher

Written by Burt Kennedy. Based on the short story “The Captives” by Elmore Leonard.

Class of 2000 

The Plot: After he loses a bet and has to sell his horse, aging cowboy Pat Brennan (Randolph Scott) hitches a ride on a stagecoach that his friend Rintoon (Arthur Hunnicutt) is driving. Traveling with the newlywed Willard & Doretta Mims (John Hubbard & Maureen O’Sullivan) in tow, the stagecoach is held up at a way-station by Frank Usher (Richard Boone) and his young buck henchmen (Skip Homeier and Henry Silva). Upon learning that Doretta is the daughter of a wealthy local copper mine owner, Frank agrees to holding her ransom rather than simply robbing the stagecoach. While they wait for the money to arrive, Frank takes a liking to Brennan, who is aware that he and the rest of the captives will be killed after the ransom is paid. Can Brennan outwit the bad guys and save the day? And what exactly is a “Tall T”, anyway?

Why It Matters: The NFR’s brief write-up highlights the “deftly stylized” landscape in the film, as well as Boone’s work as “the most memorable of Boetticher’s witty, intelligent villains.” An essay by film distributor Michael Schlesinger is a love letter to Budd Boetticher.

But Does It Really?: Perhaps I set my expectations too high because of the Elmore Leonard connection (I liked “3:10 to Yuma”), but even at 77 minutes it was a chore to get through “The Tall T”. There are those who celebrate “Tall T” for being more complex and morally ambiguous than other Westerns of the era, and granted it is that, but it also felt a bit slight to me. At times the film aims for a gripping character study in the vein of “The Naked Spur”, but never fully hits that mark. Further research shows that “Tall T” made the NFR as representation of Budd Boetticher and his “Ranown Cycle” of Westerns, but without that context I could only take the film as face value, which given my track record for disliking Westerns did not bode well for “Tall T”. Based on the Boetticher/Ranown connection and the film’s uniqueness compared to other ‘50s Westerns, I won’t question the NFR standing for “Tall T”, but this was not one of my more memorable movie-watching experiences for this blog.

Everybody Gets One: Oscar “Budd” Boetticher spent the early 1940s working his way up the studio ladder at Columbia from crew member to first assistant director to director. In 1956, Boetticher got the opportunity to direct “Seven Men from Now”, a Western starring Randolph Scott and written by Burt Kennedy. Although the film was recut against Boetticher’s wishes, he enjoyed the collaboration so much that he quickly reunited with Scott and Kennedy for his next film, “The Tall T”. Also making their sole NFR appearance here is Richard Boone, best known at the time as the star of the TV drama “Medic”, who shortly after “Tall T” would begin a six season run in his most famous role as a gunfighter for hire on the Western “Have Gun – Will Travel”.

Wow, That’s Dated: Although we do have to sit through some chauvinism directed at the film’s sole female character, there are amazingly no slams against Indigenous people in this Western (in fact, no Indigenous people at all). Also, day for night shooting: How I’ve missed you.

Title Track: This film adaptation of “The Captives” needed another title because another film was already registered as “The Captives” (though I couldn’t find a record of any film called “The Captives” being released in the late 1950s). “The Tall Rider” was the film’s working title, with Boetticher changing it to “The Tall T” after the nickname for the Tenvoorde ranch, the way-station the robbery takes place at. Strangely, any dialogue referring to the ranch as “The Tall T” didn’t make the final cut, making the title a bit of a puzzler to the casual moviegoer. Side note: The film’s original trailer (embedded above) claims the T stands for Terror. It does not.

Seriously, Oscars?: No nominations for “The Tall T” from the Oscars or anyone else. Budd Boetticher’s sole Oscar nomination came in 1951 for his story of “Bullfighter and the Lady” (see “Legacy” below for more about Boetticher’s love of bullfighting and matadors).

Other notes 

  • “The Tall T” is the second of what has become known as “The Ranown Cycle” following “Seven Men from Now”. The Ranown Cycle got its name because the bulk of them were produced by Randolph Scott and Harry Joe Brown. There were seven films total in the cycle, though the canonicity of some of the later entries not involving Brown or screenwriter Burt Kennedy is debated among purists.
  • The film is surprisingly faithful to the original Elmore Leonard story, following the events and dialogue of “The Captives” almost completely verbatim. While “The Captives” begins with Brennan flagging down the stagecoach, “The Tall T” begins with the events leading up to that (which are only described in “The Captives” after their occurrence). I understand the inclusion of these opening scenes to pad out the runtime and give the main characters a proper movie introduction, but it means the robbery doesn’t happen until 20 minutes in. When your movie is 77 minutes, you need to hit the ground running. I think it was this stalled beginning that made me lose interest during my viewing. Unsurprisingly, Leonard liked this film adaptation…except for the added opening.
  • Hats off to Randolph Scott, who was 59 when he made this. His Brennan has more shades of gray than the typical hero Scott played in previous Westerns, but he’s nowhere as disreputable as his character in “Ride the High Country”. I also relate very much to the massive sweat stains Brennan has on his shirt throughout the opening. Been there, buddy. Been there.
  • Oscar nominee Arthur Hunnicutt is making the most of his limited screen time playing the kind of grizzled supporting part he played in so many Westerns. 
  • Elmore Leonard in particular liked Richard Boone’s performance in this film, saying he “recited the lines just the way I heard them when I wrote the story.” I thought Boone was fine as the main heavy, though I’m not familiar enough with Boone’s other performances to know how much of a stretch this role was for him.
  • Like Anthony Quinn and countless others before and after, Henry Silva was one of those actors you could cast as just about any non-white ethnicity you wanted. For the record, Henry Silva was of Sicilian and Spanish descent. And sadly, you heard it correctly: Silva’s character’s name in “Tall T” is a certain one-syllable Asian slur that rhymes with “drink”, as in the thing I needed after hearing what his character’s name was.
  • There are those who argue that at 46, Maureen O’Sullivan was too old to be “the girl” in this movie, but seeing as how the character is a plain Jane-type who everyone is amazed finally got married, I buy it. And as always with Maureen O’Sullivan’s performances, we get brief flashes of some of the genetics she passed down to her daughter, Mia Farrow.
  • [Spoilers] Man, Willard Mims sucks. He’s just a spineless, totally unlikable character, which I guess is a testament to John Hubbard’s performance. Even the movie’s bad guys don’t like how disrespectful Willard is to Doretta, and I was very grateful they shoot and kill him halfway through the movie. 
  • The “Naked Spur” comparisons start to crop up when Brennan attempts to turn the captors against each other, while also making totally unnecessary moves on Doretta while in a cave together. Come on man, she just became a widow!
  • [Spoilers] Besides the added opening sequences, the only deviation from “The Captives” comes at the end. Originally, Frank was the second of the three robbers to be killed off, making the death of, ahem, Henry Silva’s character the climax of the story. This obviously had to change for the movie version, which creates a final showdown between Brennan and Frank that feels…off. I can’t put my finger on it, but the movie ending just left me with a feeling of “What was that?” Maybe it was my sixth sense when a movie strays from its source material, or maybe I was just done with the movie by that point. Whatever, let’s go to “Legacy” and get out of here.

Legacy

  • The Ranown Cycle continued through 1960 with “Decision at Sundown”, “Buchanan Rides Along”, “Ride Lonesome”, “Westbound”, and “Comanche Station”, with Budd Boetticher and Randolph Scott collaborating on all seven.
  • Budd Boetticher spent most of the ‘60s working on the documentary “Arruza” about his friend, famed bullfighter Carlos Arruza. After many delays, “Arruza” finally received its US release in 1972, six years after Carlos Arruza died! Unfortunately for Boetticher, all of the directing opportunities he turned down to make “Arruza” had dried up, and he only made one more movie in his lifetime, the 1985 documentary “My Kingdom For…” about the role horses play in, you guessed it, bullfighting. Budd Boetticher died in 2001, but lived long enough to see his filmography get reappraised through the lens of the auteur theory.
  • “The Tall T” is one of those movies that Martin Scorsese saw as a kid and absolutely loves. Scorsese was on the National Film Preservation Board in 2000, and between this and “Goodfellas”, Scorsese must have really worked the room that year.