#804) Before Sunrise (1995)

#804) Before Sunrise (1995)

OR “Lovers and Other Strangers on a Train”

Directed by Richard Linklater

Written by Linklater & Kim Krizan

Class of 2025

The Plot: While on a train traveling through Austria, American Jesse (Ethan Hawke) strikes up a conversation with French Céline (Julie Delpy). The two have an instant rapport, and Jesse convinces Céline to get off the train with him upon its arrival in Vienna. Over the course of a day, the two walk around Vienna, learning about each other and having deep conversations about love, pain, gender, death, and everything in between. With Jesse’s pending flight back to America in the morning, how deep will their newfound relationship go…before sunrise?

Why It Matters: The NFR write-up is mostly a salute to Linklater and “[h]is innovative use of time as a defining and recurring cinematic tool”. The film gets a shout-out as “one of cinema’s most sustained explorations of love and the passage of time”.

But Does It Really?: Richard Linklater is one of those filmmakers who should have multiple entries on the NFR, and “Before Sunrise” is a good choice. I had never seen “Before Sunrise” prior to its NFR induction, and overall I enjoyed its lowkey vibe and the chemistry between Delpy and Hawke. Above all, “Before Sunrise” made me nostalgic for the impulsivity of your early 20s when you know everything and can go anywhere, a feeling this movie captures perfectly. As another standout in Linklater’s filmography, and the first in a surprise trilogy, “Before Sunrise” earns its NFR status.

Everybody Gets One: Linklater spent nine months trying to cast his two main characters before finding Julie Delpy and Ethan Hawke. Julie Delpy was born in Paris to artistic parents and began acting at a young age in such films as “Europa Europa” and Krzystof Kieślowski’s “Three Colours” trilogy. Ethan Hawke also started off as a child actor in Joe Dante’s “Explorers”, and was initially reluctant to pursue an acting career until his supporting turn in “Dead Poets Society” led to more acting opportunities. Both actors were segueing into more adult roles when “Before Sunrise” came their way. Fun Fact: Because I had to put this somewhere, Ethan Hawke directed the music video for Lisa Loeb’s “Stay (I Missed You)”. It’s incredibly random until you learn that Loeb was a member of Hawke’s Malaparte theater company in the 1990s.

Wow, That’s Dated: I imagine this whole movie would have been quite different if both Jesse and Céline had smart phones. If nothing else, they could exchange contact information quickly and/or stalk each other on social media.

Seriously, Oscars?: No Oscar nominations, but “Before Sunrise” received an MTV Movie Award nomination for Best Kiss, losing to Jim Carrey and Lauren Holly for “Dumb and Dumber”. Both “Before” sequels received Oscar nominations for their screenplays.

Other notes 

  • When we last saw Richard Linklater on this blog he was coming off the cult success of “Slacker”. After his next movie, 1993’s “Dazed and Confused” (which should be on the NFR, right?), Linklater wanted to base a movie on a night he spent in 1989 wandering the streets of Philadelphia with a woman he had just met. Knowing his script needed a strong female perspective, Linklater hired Kim Krizan (an actor in his previous films) to co-write the screenplay, despite her never having written a script before. Krizan had had a similar romantic experience years earlier while riding trains across Europe, and the final script was an amalgamation of these two stories. Claims that Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy re-wrote all of their dialogue has been disputed by Krizan, though let the record show that both actors receive screenwriting credits on the sequels.
  • Jesse’s idea for a cable access show that follows people around is basically “The Truman Show” on a global scale. Are you listening, Peter Weir?
  • My first takeaway from this movie’s train scenes is that the film is a more focused version of “Slacker”. It’s still a series of philosophical vignettes like “Slacker” was, but now each vignette centers around the same two characters, allowing us to delve deeper and care more about these characters.
  • Is this what people think backpacking through Europe looks like?
  • I get where the screenplay authorship questions come into play, because this all sounds very natural. As far as I know, everything in this film was scripted, down to the pauses and the overlapping dialogue. This is a Cassavetes-level of natural film acting, easily the hardest type to pull off, and Hawke and Delpy do it with ease.
  • Linklater very quickly applies an important filmmaking rule: If you’re going to have a lot of talking scenes, stage them with a lot of movement. Whether it’s on a train or a trolley car or just two characters walking, the background is always changing, which helps keep things visually interesting as all these philosophical ideas get tossed around.
  • I was wondering if Jesse and Céline were going to take the “Sound of Music” tour, but then I remembered that’s Salzburg, not Vienna, so never mind.
  • As the author of a film blog it is my duty to point out that the ferris wheel Jesse and Céline ride on is the Wiener Risenrad, the same one from “The Third Man”. Do with that information what you will.
  • Jesse and Céline take in a game of pinball while discussing their past relationships. This begs the question: Why pinball? This is the most important conversation they’ve had up to this point, and you’re practically muting it with pinball? That’s a choice.
  • Céline’s American “dude” accent made me laugh. No further observation, just an amusing moment as this movie rounds the corner into its third act.
  • The other thing this movie makes me nostalgic for is the kind of deep late night conversations you have with friends. Good times.
  • I’m glad that after all this talk Jesse and Céline are finally entertaining the notion of hooking up. That was driving me nuts the whole movie: they’re in their early 20s, they’re in Europe, and they’ve shared plenty of emotional intimacy. How are they not getting it on like rabbits?
  • [Spoilers] Aaaaugh that ending. After much hesitation, Jesse and Céline agree to meet at the train station in six months’ time without exchanging information. It’s equal parts romantic and frustrating. Imagine seeing this in 1995 and leaving the ending at this without knowing that there will one day be sequels. On a more positive note: This may be the last movie to feature a tearful farewell at a train station, a cinematic mainstay of the ‘40s and ‘50s. I assume it was replaced by “dramatically running through the airport”.

Legacy 

  • “Before Sunrise” premiered at the 1995 Sundance Film Festival, just a few days before its general release. The film was a modest hit, and went over like gangbusters with critics (it currently holds a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes), and found continued success over the next few years thanks to home video and TV airings.
  • While there was no overwhelming demand for a sequel from audiences, Linklater and his two lead actors all expressed interest in the idea over the years, culminating in “Sunrise” being the first in a trilogy! 2004’s “Before Sunset” reunites Jesse and Céline nine years after the events of “Sunrise”, and 2013’s “Before Midnight” catches up with them after another nine year time jump, each time examining their evolution as people and their relationship with each other.
  • Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy cameo as Jesse and Céline in Linklater’s animated film “Waking Life”, elaborating on conversations they had in “Before Sunrise”. Where this fits into the continuity of the “Before” films I have no idea.
  • Richard Linklater’s immediate follow-up to “Before Sunrise” was 1996’s “SubUrbia”, and he has continued cranking out movies for the last 30 years, including several collaborations with Ethan Hawke (“Boyhood”, “Blue Moon”, etc.). Personally, I’m looking forward to Linklater’s most ambitious time concept yet, an adaptation of the Stephen Sondheim musical “Merrily We Roll Along” filmed over the course of 20 years. See you in the early 2040s!

The NFR Class of 2006: SexyBack

December 27th 2006: The Library of Congress gives the world a belated Christmas/Hanukkah present (or a right on time Kwanzaa present) with 25 more films on the National Film Registry, making it a total of 450 movies. Here now for the 20th anniversary is the Class of 2006 (with selections from my posts on each film):

Traffic in Souls (1913): “a heavy-handed, oft-confusing film”

Tess of the Storm Country (1914): “I have nothing to say about this film. It happened, I saw it, I can cross it off the list. Moving on.”

The Curse of Quon Gwon (1916/1917): “written and directed by a Chinese woman, a rarity of both ethnicity and gender.”

Flesh and the Devil (1927): “helped launch [Greta] Garbo’s star.”

The Last Command (1928): “a fine showing for [Josef] von Sternberg, but can it stand on its own as a classic?”

Applause (1929): “the film’s usage of its soundtrack…is downright revolutionary by 1929 standards.”

St. Louis Blues (1929): “the only existing footage of Bessie Smith.”

The Big Trail (1930): “a unique enough curio in film history to warrant a spot on the NFR.”

Red Dust (1932): “[Clark] Gable and [Jean] Harlow are irresistible together”

Daughter of Shanghai (1937): “an underrated, largely forgotten film that was vastly ahead of its time.”

Early Abstractions #1-5, 7, 10 (1939-1956 or 1946-1957): “a seven-part collision of art, film, shapes, and music.”

Siege (1940): “an on-the-ground account of [World War II’s] first two weeks.” “lightning in a bottle documentation”.

Notorious (1946): “an excellent example of [Hitchcock’s] signature style.”

In the Street (1948): “a unique collaboration between three people who, as far as I know, had never made a movie prior to this.”

A Time Out of War (1954): “proved there was an audience for [student] films outside of the classroom.”

Think of Me First as a Person (1960-1975): “strikes the right tone with its delicate subject matter”

The T.A.M.I. Show (1964): “the greatest American film ever made, and I will fight you on this one.”

Reminiscences of a Journey to Lithuania (1971-1972): “a sort of film collage…[with] an emotional story at this film’s core.”

Blazing Saddles (1974): “my favorite Mel Brooks movie”, “uproariously funny”.

Rocky (1976): “gave the world something that had been missing from the ‘70s movie scene: Hope.”

Halloween (1978): “an effectively scary movie”, “a fresh 90-minute adrenaline rush”

sex, lies, and videotape (1989): “an erotically charged character study with a well-cast ensemble.”

Uksuum Cauyai: The Drums of Winter (1989): “an engaging glimpse at an oft-ignored culture.”

Groundhog Day (1993): “may in fact be a perfect movie”.

Fargo (1996): “one of [the Coen brothers’] more accessible, twistedly funny films.”

Other notes

  • This is one of the more extreme NFR rosters I’ve come across. We only get a handful of heavy-hitters this time (The inclusion of “Rocky” starts getting us into “How was that not already on the list?” territory), but this class is comprised mainly of obscure shorts and deep cuts. An eclectic group, if not the most outstanding. Still, it has one of my favorite movies (“Blazing Saddles”), plus a new favorite I watched for the first time for this blog (“The T.A.M.I. Show”. Seriously, it’s great).
  • One common thread I noticed this time around is how many of these films circle around the steamier aspects of love and sex. We get multiple entries with love triangles, extra marital affairs, sex workers, one night stands, and a few doomed romances for sentimental sake. Every NFR class has a few of these elements, but it seemed to be a dominant theme this time.
  • Not much new in the official Library of Congress press release, but Dr. James Billington makes his annual plea for film preservation, including mention of the recently discovered “vinegar syndrome”, which greatly effects acetate-based “safety film”. I imagine this is why so many documentaries and amateur films are included this go-round; to highlight the increased fragility of these lesser-known titles.
  • Much like the extreme genre selections in the Class of 2006, my responses to these moves run the gamut from “I adore this movie” to “I am so over this movie.” Despite my objections, most of these films got a pass from me for their NFR inclusion. 
  • The “Red Dust” post introduced one of my favorite bits on the blog: the Clark Gable Prize for Best Reaction to Being Shot. I’m surprised how often it comes up on this blog.
  • Once again, I question how “Think of Me First as a Person” made the NFR only four months after its official premiere. That is not a knock against the movie, which I thought was great, but we have a technicality on our hands and I want to know who’s responsible for this. Looking at you, NFPB member Dwight Swanson. Don’t think I forgot about you!
  • A few double dippers this year: Actors Evelyn Brent, Andie McDowell, and Tully Marshall, cinematographer Arthur Edeson, and producer Irving Thalberg.
  • Among the thematic double-dippers (aside from all the love/sex ones listed above): movies that spawned franchises, struggling immigrants, Hollywood studio gate crashing, movie stars in their breakout roles, positive Asian representation, Black entertainers performing their hits, wartime trauma, personal documentaries, and people stuck where they are due to weather.
  • One coincidence worth noting: Two of our filmmakers – James Agee and Terry Sanders – worked on another future NFR entry: “The Night of the Hunter”; Agee as screenwriter, Sanders as second unit director.
  • Speaking of “Night” movies, “Night at the Museum” was number one at the US box office when the Class of 2006 was announced. Also playing in theaters at the time was “Rocky Balboa”, the fifth sequel to concurrent NFR inductee “Rocky”. Other noteworthy films include “Happy Feet”, “Casino Royale”, “Borat”, “The Departed”, “Dreamgirls”, and a 3D re-release of “The Nightmare Before Christmas”.
  • And finally, some favorites of my own subtitles: Squatter Knows Best, Garbo Cheats!, From Russia Without Love, Kitty Foiled, Harlow If You Hear Me, Showtime Near the Apollo, Life with Mikey, Spader Neutered, and all the various “Groundhog Day” subtitles.

The Class of 2007 should be coming soon. In the meantime, thanks for reading, and please keep taking care of each other.

Tony

#803) sex, lies, and videotape (1989)

#803) sex, lies, and videotape (1989)

OR “Spader Neutered”

Directed & Written by Steven Soderbergh

Class of 2006

The Plot: Graham Dalton (James Spader) returns to Baton Rouge to visit his college friend John Mullany (Peter Gallagher). While Graham realizes he now has little in common with John, he hits it off with John’s wife Ann (Andie MacDowell), who is unaware that John is having an affair with her sister Cynthia (Laura San Giacomo). As their friendship grows, Ann learns that Graham is impotent, and can only achieve an erection while videotaping women talking about their sexual experiences. Sex is frankly discussed, lies are exposed, and videotape is…taped in the directorial debut of Steven Soderbergh.

Why It Matters: The NFR write-up on the movie is two brief sentences; one celebrating the film’s “low-key style”, the other declaring that it “launched an independent film renaissance.”

But Does It Really?: I feel like every decade has a movie that reignited the American independent film scene (“A Woman Under the Influence”, “Pulp Fiction”, etc.), and if “sex, lies, and videotape” happens to be that movie for the ‘80s, so be it. As a film, “sex, lies, and videotape” still works as an erotically charged character study with a well-cast ensemble. As an NFR entry, the film represents its era of independent film, as well as the filmography of Steven Soderbergh, who somehow still only has one film on the Registry. And if nothing else, this movie fully delivers on its title. While it’s not the most excited I’ve ever been about a film’s NFR status, I understand and support the induction of “sex, lies, and videotape” into the Registry.

Shout Outs: We meet the annoying barfly character while he’s doing an impression of Marlon Brando in “Apocalypse Now”.

Everybody Gets One: Born in Atlanta and raised in Charlottesville and Baton Rouge, Steven Soderbergh became interested in filmmaking in his teen years, and shortly thereafter moved to Los Angeles and became a freelance editor. Soderbergh had been thinking about “sex, lies, and videotape” for a full year before he started penning the screenplay on a road trip from Baton Rouge to Los Angeles (hopefully he wasn’t driving). “sex, lies, and videotape” was Soderbergh’s feature directorial debut, and was filmed in the summer of 1988 in Baton Rouge on a budget of $1.2 million. Oh, and Soderbergh was 25 while he was making the film. Let that sink in.

Wow, That’s Dated: Well obviously a third of the title. Speaking of…

Title Track: “sex, lies, and videotape” was one of several titles Steven Soderbergh considered for his film, though he favored “46:02” (supposedly the length of Ann’s videotape). And yes, the title is all lowercase. 

Seriously, Oscars?: Despite sweeping the Independent Spirit Awards and winning the Palme d’Or at Cannes, “sex, lies, and videotape” only received a single Oscar nomination for Soderbergh’s Original Screenplay. In a stacked category that included “Do the Right Thing” and “When Harry Met Sally…”, they all lost to “Dead Poets Society”, which is a fine film (and somehow not on the NFR), but come on.

Other notes 

  • That’s quite a cast you got there. At this point in her career, Andie MacDowell was best known as the model who was dubbed in that Tarzan movie, so it’s nice seeing her finally being allowed to show some range. Having recently watched James Spader in “Pretty in Pink” for the first time, I get how critics at the time viewed his more vulnerable work here as a breakout performance. We also get great supporting turns from Peter Gallagher and especially Laura San Giacomo, who I’m surprised didn’t get more film offers following this performance.
  • Speaking of San Giacomo’s performance: With her wry line delivery and sex positive attitude, Cynthia is very close to being Roz from “Frasier”.
  • As someone with thick eyebrows, I appreciate Peter Gallagher’s lifelong effort to make thick eyebrows sexy (because otherwise all we’ve got is Eugene Levy). Side note about Gallagher’s character: Yes, his name is John Mullany, pronounced the same as but spelled differently from the similarly named comedian. 
  • I noticed in the early scenes that the camera is almost always moving. This was deliberate on Soderbergh’s part in an effort to keep the dialogue scenes from being too static. In fact, Soderbergh and cinematographer Walt Lloyd do an overall good job of keeping the film from being a filmed play of four characters talking. Soderbergh also spices things up with the editing, which he did himself before his longtime collaboration with the elusive yet artistically similar Mary Ann Bernard.
  • Spader pays $400 rent for a duplex in Baton Rouge, which is a little over $1000 in today’s money. I’ve been saying it for the better part of a decade: We truly suck at inflation. 
  • Perhaps the most impressive thing about this film for me: Despite all the talk about sex in this film, we see very little of it. We get a few shots of John and Cyn pre and post “the act”, but there’s no nudity. The film’s surprisingly erotic dialogue more than makes up for this, letting the viewers’ imaginations fill in the blanks.
  • Graham’s impotent? Buddy, just give it a few years and Viagra will change your life.
  • Either Andie is trying to drop her Southern accent, or Laura is trying to pick it up. The results are in that muddy Leslie Howard gray area.
  • I’m guessing the real life version of Graham’s hobby would not nearly be as sexy or appealing to anyone else. Spader crawled so the pervy teen from “American Beauty” could walk.
  • One scene I would have liked to see is John, upon confronting Graham about his videotape hobby, asking how to operate the VCR. “Is there an ‘Input’?”, “No, it has to be on Channel 3…”
  • Yeah, I had a feeling that rain in the final shot wasn’t planned. According to cinematographer Walt Lloyd, the shoot was occasionally interrupted by “biblical rains”. Having gone through my first summer in the South, I get how those summer storms sneak up on you. Speaking of that final shot: Wait, that’s it?
  • The film is dedicated to Ann Dollard, Soderbergh’s agent who died during production.

Legacy 

  • A work in progress version of “sex, lies, and videotape” premiered at the US Film Festival in January 1989, where it won the Most Popular Film prize and was purchased by Miramax Films following a bidding war. The film received a general release in August 1989 and was a financial and critical hit.
  • Steven Soderbergh’s follow up movie was the 1991 biopic “Kafka”, which, like most of his 1990s filmography, disappointed both critics and audiences. Soderbergh’s career finally took an upswing with 1998’s well-received “Out of Sight”. Subsequent films include “Erin Brockovich”, “Ocean’s Eleven”, “Magic Mike”, and “Traffic”, the latter for which won Soderbergh the Oscar for Best Director.
  • Our quartet of actors have all maintained successful careers nearly 40 years after this film’s release. Andie MacDowell parlayed this film’s success into a movie career (though nowadays she considers herself best known as Margaret Qualley’s mother), while Spader, Gallagher, and San Giacomo all found continued stardom on TV. I recall enjoying San Giacomo on the sitcom “Just Shoot Me!”, and Spader’s Emmy-magnet turn on “Boston Legal”. My wife remembers Peter Gallagher as “the hot dad from ‘The O.C.’”
  • “sex, lies, and videotape” is one of those movies that still gets referenced every so often, but only for its title. Every TV show has done an episode with a pun-based version of this title. Even an episode of “Goof Troop” got in on the act with “Wrecks, Lies, & Videotape”!
  • Soderbergh made “an unofficial sequel of sorts” to this film with 2001’s “Full Frontal”, even though no one can explain to me what exactly the connection between the two films is. Soderbergh has stated in recent years that he wrote a more direct sequel during the COVID pandemic that focuses on Ann and Cynthia 30 years later. MacDowell and San Giacomo have expressed interest, but nothing further than that has happened with the project.

#802) Electronic Labyrinth: THX 1138 4EB (1967)

#802) Electronic Labyrinth: THX 1138 4EB (1967)

OR “George Orwell’s ‘The Fugitive’”

Directed & Written by George Lucas

Class of 2010

The Plot: In the dystopian future of 2187, humans are under constant surveillance by both man and machine. One human named THX 1138 (Dan Nachtsheim) has escaped, and operators are determined to locate and capture him. That’s about it plot-wise, but behind the camera is the confident hand of a young filmmaker named George Lucas. And now you know the rest of the story!

Why It Matters: The NFR gives a quick rundown on the movie and praises its “technical inventiveness”. An essay by film scholar Matthew Holtmeier follows Lucas’ trajectory from this film to “Star Wars” and Industrial Light and Magic (and of course this film’s subsequent feature adaptation: “THX 1138”).

But Does It Really?: “Electronic Labyrinth” covers two of the NFR’s favorite subgenres: student films and “stepping stone” movies for big directors. Choosing one of Lucas’ student films for NFR inclusion is an inspired choice. In a way, “Electronic Labyrinth” is a peek at both the future and an alternate universe: the future of Lucas’ sci-fi world building skills, and the alternate universe where Lucas isn’t saddled with the crowd-pleasing tropes of the “Star Wars” franchise. As for the film itself, while “Electronic Labyrinth” is bizarre and a bit impenetrable, the production value is so high, and the filmmaking style so impressive, you almost can’t believe this is a student film. A yes for “Electronic Labyrinth” on the NFR for representing George Lucas’ early artistic promise.

Everybody Gets One: Growing up in Modesto, California, George Lucas spent his adolescence reading comic books, watching old adventure serials on TV, and, as he got older, racing cars. A near-fatal car accident at age 18 deterred Lucas from pursuing a racing career, and he eventually ended up at USC as a film major. As a grad student, Lucas taught a cinematography class to U.S. Navy students, and used his students as crew members for a short science fiction film he wanted to make based on an idea he had with classmates Matthew Robbins and Walter Murch. 

Wow, That’s Dated: Good to see that analog technology makes a big comeback in the 2180s. I didn’t realize the nostalgia cycle is 20, 40, and 220 years.

Title Track: THX 1138 is our protagonist, with 4EB his classification: Class 4, Eros Body (whatever that means). The name is allegedly derived from George Lucas’ phone number at the time.

Seriously, Oscars?: No Oscar nod for “Electronic Labyrinth”, but it did win first prize at the 1968 National Student Film Festival. This film predates the Student Academy Awards by six years, where it no doubt would have cleaned up. For the record, the 1967 Oscar for Live Action Short went to Christopher Chapman’s “A Place to Stand”, as seen at the Ontario pavilion at Expo 67.

Other notes 

  • Super random, but the year 2187 is my bicentennial!
  • Does THX 1138 know Hollywood Extra 9413? The number on the forehead has to be a nod to “9413”, right?
  • I’ve watched “Electronic Labyrinth” twice now and I will admit that while I’m still not 100 percent sure what is happening, it’s all very impressive. Like, how do you even think up a movie like this? On a related note, this is where Lucas’ reputation comes in handy: If “Electronic Labyrinth” were made by somebody who hadn’t achieved any future success, I’d probably be more apprehensive or downright confused by everything. But because it’s Lucas I’m willing to be more patient with this movie. It didn’t necessarily pay off, but it did help smooth things over.
  • Using Navy equipment for your sci-fi short film? What a great idea…
  • Is this movie implying that Jesus was 0000? Apparently this is fleshed out a bit more in the feature adaptation.
  • I swear at one point THX runs down the “Serene Velocity” hallway. Speaking of location shooting, thanks to the Navy connection, Lucas was able to film in places that were otherwise unavailable, including at both LAX and the Van Nuys Airport, as well as a parking structure on the UCLA campus. Well well well NFR, you couldn’t go one non-UCLA student film without sneaking in a UCLA connection of some kind, could you?
  • As with any student film on the NFR (but especially this one), I wonder what Lucas’ final grade on the project was. I’m sure the other submissions were very contemporary and artsty-fartsy, so Lucas must have gotten points for originality.

Legacy 

  • Following the positive reaction to “Electronic Labyrinth”, Lucas moved to San Francisco and co-founded American Zoetrope with Francis Ford Coppola, who suggested he adapt the short into a feature film. Released in 1971 with a trimmed-down title, “THX 1138” was a box office flop and received mixed critical reception. The film’s box office failure led to George taking a more audience-friendly route with his subsequent pictures, first with the nostalgia vehicle “American Graffiti”, and then “Star Wars”, which skews much more towards optimistic science fantasy than pessimistic science fiction.
  • The name THX 1138 has shown up as an easter egg in subsequent Lucas films, including both “American Graffiti” and “Star Wars”. Lucas also named his sound system after THX. Man, I miss seeing that at the beginning of movies.

#801) The Oath of the Sword (1914)

#801) The Oath of the Sword (1914)

OR “Triangle of Sadness”

Directed by Frank Shaw

Class of 2025 

“The Oath of the Sword” can be viewed on the National Film Preservation Foundation website.

The Plot: In a small fishing village in Japan, Masao (Tomi Mori) is betrothed to Hisa (Hisa Numa), but yearns to go to America to study. Masao gets his wish, promising to return and marry Hisa when he graduates. While at UC Berkeley, Masao meets Captain Dean (Actor Unknown) who ends up shipwrecked in Masao’s fishing village and falling for Hisa himself. Will Hisa remember her vow to Masao? Or will she dishonor her dying father Gombei (Kohano Akashi) and the oath of the sword?

Why It Matters: The NFR provides a synopsis and some historical context, and praises the film for “highlight[ing] the significance of independent film productions created by and for Asian American communities.”

But Does It Really?: As a film, “Oath of the Sword” is fine. There’s some solid storytelling, although due to some missing footage the plot gets a little hazy towards the end. But once you learn that the film is the earliest surviving film produced by an Asian American company (and that it recently received a National Film Preservation Board-backed restoration), you start to see how “Oath” found its way onto the NFR. No argument for the film’s NFR inclusion, and if you’ve got 31 minutes to spare, you could do a lot worse than watch this movie.

Everybody Gets One: Most of the cast had achieved some success on stage and screen in Japan, but most noteworthy is Yutaka Abe, seen here as Hisa’s brother. Abe appeared in a number of American films (including NFR entry “The Cheat”) under the screen name Jack Abbe, and returned to Japan in the early 1920s, spending the next four decades as a prolific film director.

Title Track: The actual oath of the sword within the film is: “If thou do sin, by this Sword ye must die.” Yeesh, couldn’t you just make them King of England instead?

Other notes 

  • “The Oath of the Sword” was produced by the Japanese American Film Company, an L.A. based production company founded to counter a growing number of films featuring “yellow peril” and other anti-Asian fear mongering tactics. The JAFC began by producing educational shorts, and “Oath” appears to be their first narrative film, with the authenticity of its Japanese cast used as a major selling point. 
  • The surviving print of “Oath” is not the full film, and I’m guessing a lot of the missing footage is intertitles. Some are recreated digitally for the restored version, but there’s a lot of the film that goes without intertitles where I could definitely use some. What is happening?
  • I’m only a handful of titles into the NFR Class of 2025, but there’s already two movies where our main character is a college athlete. What are the odds? And as best I can tell, “Oath of the Sword” filmed the college scenes on location at the UC Berkeley campus. Take that, “The Graduate”!
  • As the third member of this movie’s love triangle, Captain Dean seemingly comes out of nowhere. Am I supposed to know who he is? Apparently there is a scene missing from the surviving print that gives Captain Dean a proper introduction, and also includes his wife! This changes my whole viewing experience!
  • Question: Why didn’t Hisa wait for Masao to come back before hooking up with Captain Dean? It’s not like she assumed he was dead or anything, she knew he was going to be gone for four years. Man, long distance relationships are tough.
  • Like many Asian-produced films of the era, “Oath” is a variation on Madame Butterfly, the short story by John Luther Long as well as the Puccini opera. If you haven’t read or seen Madame Butterfly, the “Oath” ending takes a surprisingly tragic turn. Then again, once that sword got established, I had a feeling things wouldn’t end well.
  • My moral takeaway: As far as romantic relationships are concerned, college changes everything.

Legacy 

  • While the Japanese American Film Company had plans for more movies (including ones filmed in Japan and Hawaii), the abrupt closure of their distributor Sawyer Film Mart, as well as rising anti-Asian sentiment in America, led to the JAFC quickly folding shortly after the release of “The Oath of the Sword”.
  • In the first half-century following the film’s release, the sole surviving print of “The Oath of the Sword” exchanged hands a few times, ultimately landing at the George Eastman Museum in 1963, which made a safety print of the film around 1980. The film was rediscovered in part by the efforts of Denise Khor, who was researching early Japanese American films for her book “Transpacific Convergences: Race, Migration, and Japanese American Film Culture before World War II”. Kohr also assisted with the film’s full restoration in 2021 through a grant from the National Film Preservation Board. The restored version premiered in 2023, and the film joined the NFR two years later (well, technically three years later. Thanks a lot, government shutdown).