#810) Brooklyn Bridge (1981)

#810) Brooklyn Bridge (1981)

OR “The Docs of New York”

Directed by Ken Burns

Written by Amy Stechler. Based on “The Great Bridge” by David McCullough.

Class of 2025

The Plot: New York’s famous Brooklyn Bridge finally gets its due in Ken Burns’ first documentary. Presented in two halves, “Brooklyn Bridge” chronicles the bridge’s lengthy and dangerous construction as well as its legacy and impact on pop culture and architecture. And even at this early stage in Ken Burns’ career, we get plenty of zoomed-in historical photos with accompanying voice-overs. 

Why It Matters: The NFR gives some background for the film and praises Ken Burns as “a trusted public historian”. The write-up includes an interview with Ken Burns for the Library of Congress upon the induction of “Brooklyn Bridge” into the NFR. Did you know Ken Burns nominates films for NFR consideration too? Looks like I’m in esteemed company.

But Does It Really?: Because he’s known primarily for television, I didn’t realize Ken Burns has a few theatrical documentaries, and given Burns’ impact on documentary film of course one of them should be on the NFR. Like so many of Burns’ documentaries, “Brooklyn Bridge” quite impressively makes history come alive, turning what could have been bland engineering history into something much more personal and cinematic. I learned a lot about the Brooklyn Bridge thanks to this film, though to be fair I didn’t know anything about it going in; but still, it’s an informative, entertaining watch. Ken Burns is one of the most influential documentarians in American film, so having “Brooklyn Bridge” on the NFR is a natural choice to honor the man.

Everybody Gets One: Ken Burns knew he wanted to be a filmmaker since childhood, but it wasn’t until studying at Hampshire College that he decided on documentary filmmaking, fascinated by figuring out a way to “wake up American history”. In the late ‘70s, Burns received a copy of “The Great Bridge”, David McCullough’s book about the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge, and knew he had to make a documentary based on it. “Brooklyn Bridge” was Ken Burns’ first documentary feature, and his first collaboration with PBS.

Seriously, Oscars?: “Brooklyn Bridge” was nominated for Best Documentary Feature at the 1982 Oscars, losing to Arnold Schwartzman’s “Genocide”, which…yeah this movie was not going to beat the Holocaust. Although Ken Burns didn’t win an Oscar for “Brooklyn Bridge” (or for his subsequent nomination for “The Statue of Liberty”), he has received five Emmys, four Peabodys, and a Grammy for his TV documentaries. 

Other notes 

  • We start with some genuinely beautiful compositions of the Brooklyn Bridge and the New York skyline, shot by Burns over the course of two years. It’s just like “Manhattan” except it’s in color and significantly less problematic.
  • We do get plenty of what has been dubbed “the Ken Burns effect”, in which the camera zooms in on a still photo. I don’t recall it being so frequent to the point of distraction, but then again maybe it’s just been done so often in the last 45 years I didn’t notice. Shoutout to Burns and his team for applying the Ken Burns effect manually; they went to dozens of film archives and filmed each photograph on an easel, complete with zoom-ins. Who needs Final Cut Pro?
  • Burns assembled quite the eclectic cast for this film’s first person voiceovers. First off is narrator David McCullough, author of the original book that inspired Burns, who is also interviewed throughout. Washington Roebling (who oversaw most of the bridge’s construction) is voiced by his own great-grandson Paul Roebling, and his wife Emily is voiced by the great Julie Harris making her second NFR appearance. Most surprising among the voice cast, author Kurt Vonnegut and playwright Arthur Miller! I assume Vonnegut is the one voicing the Mark Twain quote about Roebling’s Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge.
  • Again, I didn’t know anything about the Brooklyn Bridge before watching this film, so all the information was new to me. For starters I didn’t realize it took 14 years to build! The other major point is that the original engineer John Roebling died a month into construction, with his son Washington taking over, though he quickly developed Caisson disease (aka “the bends”) and had to supervise the entire construction from home. Man, the past was brutal.
  • On a related note, you could not pay me to walk on a bridge while it was still under construction.
  • Things really take off in Part Two, which celebrates the bridge as an icon. We begin with numerous paintings and sketches of the bridge from a variety of artists and styles. They’re all wonderful to see, but most notable to me was Georgia O’Keeffe’s 1949 painting of the bridge, which somehow takes the bridge’s rigid structure and molds it into O’Keeffe’s…um, anatomical aesthetic.
  • Also included among the tributes are plenty of film clips that either feature the bridge or prominently reference it. The films included are “The Bowery” with George Raft, “Way Out West” with Laurel and Hardy, “It Happened in Brooklyn” with Frank Sinatra, “Bowery Bugs” with Bugs Bunny, and “Tarzan’s New York Adventure” with…Tarzan.
  • There are several references throughout to people being conned into buying the Brooklyn Bridge. While never explicitly mentioned within the documentary, this is a reference to George C. Parker, a con man in the early 20th century who would allegedly convince naive immigrants fresh off the boat that he constructed the Brooklyn Bridge and would sell it to them for everything they had. While it’s disputed that Parker ever actually did that, the idea of buying the Brooklyn Bridge became synonymous with gullible acts of stupidity. And if you believe that I got a bridge I can sell you.
  • Playwright Arthur Miller makes an on-camera appearance at the end to provide his introspection about what the Brooklyn Bridge symbolizes. Though not directly referenced, Miller wrote the play “A View from the Bridge” about Italian-Americans in Brooklyn, so I assume that’s why he’s here.

Legacy 

  • “Brooklyn Bridge” premiered at the Brooklyn Museum in late 1981 before playing the film festival circuit and a brief theatrical run. The film was first broadcast on PBS on the Brooklyn Bridge’s 99th birthday: May 24th, 1982.
  • The Brooklyn Bridge has gone through a number of refurbishments over the last 45 years, including a complete replacement of its cable system and the addition of protected bike paths. The bridge is still one of the most popular tourist attractions in New York, hosting over 115,000 cars, 30,000 walkers, and 4,000 cyclists a day.
  • “Brooklyn Bridge” should not be confused with “Brooklyn Bridge”, the high-quality yet low-rated 1990s sitcom about Gary David Goldberg’s childhood in Brooklyn. Still, when am I ever going to get another chance to reference that show on this blog?
  • David McCullough would go on to write two presidential autobiographies that would become prestige HBO projects: “Truman” and “John Adams”.
  • Ken Burns’ follow-up to “Brooklyn Bridge” was a documentary about Shakers, but he came into prominence in 1990 with the success of his nine part series “The Civil War”. Other notable Ken Burns documentaries include “Baseball”, “Jazz”, and “The War”. As of this writing, Burns’ most recent series was his six-parter “The American Revolution” in 2025. In the aforementioned Library of Congress interview, Burns stated that he was “over the moon” about “Brooklyn Bridge” being added to the National Film Registry.

#809) Sleeping Beauty (1959)

#809) Sleeping Beauty (1959)

OR “Three Fairies and a Little Lady”

Directed by Clyde Geronimi (supervising), Eric Larson, Wolfgang Reitherman, and Les Clark (sequence)

Written by Erdman Penner, Joe Rinaldi, Winston Hibler, Bill Peet, Ted Sears, Ralph Wright, and Milt Banta. Based on the fairy tale by Charles Perrault.

Class of 2019

The Plot: Once upon a time, the beautiful Princess Aurora (voiced by Mary Costa) is born, and her kingdom celebrates at her christening. The festivities are thwarted, however, by Maleficent (voiced by Eleanor Audley) an evil fairy who wasn’t invited. She curses the baby to die on her 16th birthday by pricking the spindle of a spinning wheel. Thankfully, the good fairies Flora, Fauna, and Merryweather, (voiced by Verna Felton, Barbara Jo Allen, and Barbara Luddy) change the spell so that she merely sleeps, to be awakened by true love’s first kiss. That’s about it plotwise, but please enjoy the stunningly beautiful animation as Walt Disney’s brand of storytelling reaches its pinnacle. 

Why It Matters: The NFR praises the film’s “magnificent score” and “vivid images and charming details”, while also singling out Maleficent as “one of Disney’s most enduring villainesses”. 

But Does It Really?: While not my personal favorite Disney animated film, “Sleeping Beauty” is, for my money, the most beautiful. The artistry on display is so good it distracts from the movie’s thin story and characters. But then again, “Sleeping Beauty” never pretends to be anything other than a wholesome, pure fairy tale, so there’s a lot I’m willing to forgive in the story department. Overall, the movie holds up well and still has enough enchanting moments to be considered among the best Disney films. While I never pushed to get “Sleeping Beauty” on the NFR, I’m glad it made the cut.

Seriously, Oscars?: “Sleeping Beauty” received a single Oscar nomination: Best Music (Scoring of a Musical Picture) for George Bruns’ adaptation of the Tchaikovsky ballet score. The film lost to another NFR entry: “Porgy and Bess”.

Other notes 

  • Walt Disney began plans for an animated adaptation of “Sleeping Beauty” in 1950, but production was delayed several times throughout the decade. The first draft was scrapped due to its similarities to “Snow White” and “Cinderella”, and then production was delayed in the mid-50s because Walt was unhappy with the animation (he was also focusing more on the construction of Disneyland as well as his slate of live-action movies and TV shows). “Sleeping Beauty” was originally scheduled for a 1955 release before being pushed back to 1957, then 1958, until finally being released in January 1959 at a final cost of over $6 million, the most expensive animated feature up to that point.
  • Shoutout to Eyvind Earle, credited for the film’s “Color Styling”, who primarily served as the film’s art director. In an unprecedented move, Walt gave control of the film’s visual style to Earle, the first time a single animator was given that much authority over a Disney film. Earle’s mixture of pre-Renaissance, Medieval, and Gothic gives “Sleeping Beauty” its distinct aesthetic, filling every millimeter of the Technirama 70 widescreen with beautifully detailed backgrounds, helping it stand out among Disney’s other animated features.
  • For what it’s worth, Princess Aurora is one of the few Disney heroines for which both of her birth parents are alive and stay alive for the whole movie. Granted she wasn’t raised by them and her mother doesn’t even have a name, but I’ll take what I can get.
  • Ah, Maleficent. When it comes to Disney villains, you can’t do much better than a vengeful fairy who looks like the devil and sounds like Cinderella’s stepmother. Eleanor Audley is two for two with iconic Disney villains, and this is her masterwork, cackling and chewing the scenery in her limited screentime. Bonus shoutout to the legendary Marc Davis, supervising animator for both Maleficent and Aurora. Talk about range!
  • Outside of Audley, I don’t have a lot to say about the voice cast. Mary Costa definitely has the pipes for Aurora, as does Bill Shirley as Prince Phillip. All three good fairies play well off each other, especially Luddy as stubborn Merryweather. And NFR buffs may recognize Marvin Miller as the narrator; he also narrated “Gerald McBoing-Boing” and voiced Robby the Robot in “Forbidden Planet”.
  • In true Disney fashion, a little too much time is spent fleshing out the side characters rather than our protagonists. The fairies are fun and endearing, especially when they try to plan Aurora’s birthday, but most of the film’s screentime is devoted to them rather than Aurora. We don’t even see grown-up Aurora (or Briar Rose, her witness relocation name) until 18 minutes into the movie. It also doesn’t help that Aurora is, ya know, asleep for most of the third act.
  • In a film filled with okay songs, “Once Upon a Dream” is the sole standout, serving as the film’s leitmotif (even being referenced as a minor plot point). It’s a charming sequence, although there’s an unintentional lol moment for me when the song ends and Prince Philip softly asks Aurora, “Who are you?”. These are the questions you ask before you start romantically singing at someone.
  • I’m trying very hard not to poke holes in a fairy tale, but I have a few questions. First off, they ban all the spinning wheels in the kingdom, so what did they do for clothes for 16 years? And if the curse is lifted after sunset on Aurora’s 16th birthday, why would you bring her back to the castle before sunset? I know, I know, it’s a fairy tale, just let it be. 
  • I love the reaction shot of Maleficent as she watches her goons capture Prince Philip. It’s like Jane Greer watching the fight/getting secretly turned on in “Out of the Past”.
  • That’s one heck of a finale. The score amps up with the action as Prince Philip escapes Maleficent’s dungeon, fights off her goons, and does battle with Maleficent as a fire-breathing dragon. You just wish it went on a bit longer. 
  • Perhaps the most interesting thing I learned in my research is that in the Perrault version, the prince doesn’t break the spell with a kiss, but rather by being  “captivated by her beauty”. So they did have consent back then!
  • Speaking of the original fairy tale, are we not doing the second part where Prince Philip’s mother is an ogress who wants to eat Aurora and their children? You know what, good call.

Legacy 

  • “Sleeping Beauty” premiered in 1959 to mixed reviews. While it did well at the box office, it failed to recoup its budget, resulting in Disney reporting a financial loss in 1960 for the first time in a decade. A subsequent re-release of “Sleeping Beauty” in 1970 finally landed the film in the black.
  • Always quick to cross-promote one of his movies, Walt had the castle at Disneyland named after “Sleeping Beauty” (this is 1955 when the film was still due out in 1957). When production was pushed back, dioramas were added inside the castle telling the story of “Sleeping Beauty”, which are still there to this day. Disneyland Paris also has a Sleeping Beauty Castle, complete with its own dragon in the dungeon!
  • Like so many other popular Disney franchises, the characters from “Sleeping Beauty” pop up in countless other Disney media, most notably Maleficent who typically serves as the leader of all Disney villains. Maleficent is prominently featured in the theme park show Fantasmic, though due to one viral incident her dragon form no longer breathes fire.
  • Speaking of Maleficent, the mistress of all evil has gotten not one but two live-action remake/prequel/sequels starring Angelina Jolie. The first “Maleficent” hit when live-action Disney remakes were still a novelty, but unfortunately “Mistress of Evil” arrived just as we were all getting sick of those damn things.
  • But the biggest influence “Sleeping Beauty” had was on Disney animation itself. The film’s financial loss led to layoffs at Walt Disney Productions, and Walt determined that future animation films had to be done much more cheaply. Starting with 1961’s “One Hundred and One Dalmatians”, the original drawings were Xeroxed directly onto animation cels (rather than being hand-painted), resulting in the “scratchy” animation style that defined the next era of Disney animation. It would take 30 years and another fairy tale – “The Little Mermaid” – before Disney animation hit its next zenith. 

Further Viewing: “Grand Canyon”, the Oscar-winning short that preceded “Sleeping Beauty” in its original theatrical run. This is why there’s a Grand Canyon diorama at Disneyland!

The Horse’s Head’s NFR Tournament of Losers Ballot 2026!

Another year, another round of NFR nominations. But this isn’t just any year for me: it’s my 10th year nominating films for the NFR, and to celebrate I wanted to do something a little different. Of the 249 films I’ve nominated over the last nine years, 51 have been inducted, which means 198 have become this blog’s perennial bridesmaids. So this year I’m choosing my nominees through a point system I’ve dubbed “The Horse’s Head’s Tournament of Losers Ballot 2026!”. I’ve taken each of my nominated films from the last nine years and assigned them points via a system so unnecessarily complex it would make you ask “Are you okay?” and “Seriously, are you okay? Do want to talk about it? Maybe go for a walk?” I’m fine, I promise. But I appreciate the concern.

Without further ado, my NFR Tournament of Losers Ballot 2026!

  1. Scarface (1983): 1423 points
  2. Aliens (1986): 1389 points
  3. Aladdin (1992): 1297 points
  4. Frozen (2013): 1153 points
  5. The Avengers (2012): 1075 points
  6. Fight Club (1999): 1013 points
  7. Spider-Man (2002): 986 points
  8. Avatar (2009): 964 points
  9. Gremlins (1984): 959 points
  10. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone (2001): 955 points
  11. The Sixth Sense (1999): 831 points
  12. Finding Nemo (2003): 830 points
  13. Poltergeist (1982): 824 points
  14. Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (1997): 756 points
  15. Gladiator (2000): 741 points
  16. Beetlejuice (1988): 725 points
  17. Alice in Wonderland (1951): 642 points
  18. Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954): 591 points
  19. Skyfall (2012): 586 points
  20. One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961): 581 points
  21. Fatal Attraction (1987): 561 points
  22. The Great Escape (1963): 558 points
  23. Seven (1995): 554 points
  24. Edward Scissorhands (1990): 551 points
  25. Speed (1994): 542 points
  26. The Wolf Man (1941): 539 points
  27. The Usual Suspects (1995): 529 points
  28. The Jungle Book (1967): 523 points TIE
  29. Up (2009): 523 points TIE
  30. Mrs. Doubtfire (1993): 516 points
  31. Mean Girls (2004): 495 points
  32. Good Will Hunting (1997): 485 points
  33. The Seven Year Itch (1955): 481 points
  34. Plan 9 from Outer Space (1957): 460 points
  35. 300 (2007): 453 points
  36. The Elephant Man (1980): 451 points
  37. Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure (1985): 446 points
  38. Footloose (1984): 441 points
  39. Space Jam (1996): 431 points
  40. Big (1988): 422 points
  41. Cast Away (2000): 417 points
  42. Sleepless in Seattle (1993): 414 points
  43. Song of the South (1946): 411 points
  44. Driving Miss Daisy (1989): 409 points
  45. Inglourious Basterds (2009): 408 points
  46. Boogie Nights (1997): 399 points
  47. Blue Velvet (1986): 393 points

Now you may be wondering, “Wait, 47? Didn’t you say you nominated 50?” Yes, I did. Thanks for paying attention; we should go for that walk. I swapped out the bottom three for a few ringers. Apologies to the trio of movies that made the Top 50 via the point system: Fiddler on the Roof (1971), Labyrinth (1986), and Anchorman (2004). I will prioritize these three on my 2027 ballot, though it would be funny if all three of them got inducted this year.

My first two ringer films are two personal favorites I nominate every year: “It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World” (1963) and “Original Cast Album: Company” (1970). I wrote a whole post explaining how great they are. Shout out to “Mad World”, which was eight points shy of making the list on its own.

As for my 50th film, I’m picking a 2016 film that is freshly eligible for the NFR, and there was only one movie that I felt should get the nod: Damien Chazelle’s “La La Land”. As a tribute to the golden age of Hollywood musicals and with winning lead performances from Ryan Gosling and Emma Stone, this film has maintained…Wait, there was a mistake. “Moonlight”, you guys have been nominated for the NFR. This is not a joke. “Moonlight” is my 50th NFR nominee. 

What can I say? I love topical humor.

The NFR Class of 2007: Umber-ella-ella-ella-ay-ay-ay

December 27th, 2007: The NFR bumps it up to 475 movies with its Class of 2007. As I find it increasingly difficult to come up with new ways of saying “I’ve watched all 25 movies, so here’s my recap”, I’ll just say that I’ve watched all 25 movies, so here’s my recap:

Other notes

  • The Class of 2007 is comprised of movies that aren’t so much “minor classics” as they are “near-essentials”. While none of these movies are untouchable classics in the pantheon of American film, their absence on the NFR would be too conspicuous, so their appearance almost 20 years into this list is unsurprising. I echo this sentiment in most of my write-ups on these 25, which by and large endorse their induction (although two of these movies get my “meh” rating. Yikes).
  • The big NFR-related news in 2007 was the completion of the National Audio-Visual Conservation Center in Culpeper, Virginia. Construction was finished in mid-2007, with the Center opening up to the public in 2008.
  • Shoutout to the Hollywood Reporter for interviewing “Naked City” co-writer Malvin Wald about the film’s NFR induction less than three months before his passing. There’s also a quote from NFPB staff director Stephen Leggett talking a bit about the NFR’s goal to include more sci-fi and films from the ‘70s (with “Close Encounters” at the center of that Venn diagram). More insider quotes, please!
  • We have a healthy amount of double dippers this time: Actors Joan Crawford and Gloria Grahame, screenwriters Vicki Baum and Albert Maltz, director Edmund Goulding, cinematographer William H. Daniels, art director Cedric Gibbons, composer Edward Ward, and costume designer Orry-Kelly. Most of these are thanks to having two ‘30s MGM movies on the list: “Grand Hotel” and “The Women”.
  • Thematic double dippers: Female empowerment amidst the sexist studio system, heavy-handed pleas for tolerance, pigs in prominent roles, big wide-open plains, territories on the verge of statehood, love triangles, dancers played by non-dancers, starry ensembles, makeovers, Oscar winning ‘70s cinematography, lesser silent-era comedians, and lots of Blacklisted artists.
  • Some more interesting overlap within the Class of 2007: two of these films inspired Edward Albee while writing “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” (well, one film and another filmmaker, but I’m counting it). Also worth noting: both “Close Encounters” and “Back to the Future” make quick references to “Star Wars”.
  • When the Class of 2007 was announced, the number one movie at the US box office was “National Treasure: Book of Secrets”. Also playing was future NFR entry “No Country for Old Men”, and such noteworthy entires as “I Am Legend”, “Sweeney Todd”, “Enchanted”, “Juno”, and “Bee Movie”. We also got two films from Class of 2007 directors: Robert Zemeckis (“Beowulf”) and Sidney Lumet (“Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead”).
  • Favorites of My Own Subtitles: Alpha Mail, Moor to Love, A Man and His Musings, True-ish Detective, Dix Chix Fix Pix, The Plot Thickens, and H.G. Wells’ Oedipus Rex.

Before we go, some housekeeping. Once again real life is calling me away from the blog, so “The Horse’s Head” will be taking a summer hiatus. The goal is to be back in the fall with more posts (plus my Class of 2026 nominations), but I’ll keep you up to date if things change. As always, thanks for reading, and please keep taking care of each other.

See you soon,

Tony

#808) Days of Heaven (1978)

#808) Days of Heaven (1978)

OR “Fields of Vision”

Directed & Written by Terrence Malick

Class of 2007

The Plot: Around 1916, steelworker Bill (Richard Gere) flees Chicago with his girlfriend Abby (Brooke Adams) and younger sister Linda (Linda Manz) following an altercation at work. The trio end up in the Texas panhandle working as grain shockers for a wealthy farmer (Sam Shepard). To avoid gossip among the other hired hands, Bill and Abby pose as siblings, though rumors persist. When Bill learns that the Farmer is dying of an unknown disease, he convinces Abby to marry the Farmer so that they can inherit his fortune. From here we get a complicated love triangle, set against some of the most beautiful visuals ever committed to film.

Why It Matters: The NFR calls the film “an impressionist painting for the screen”, praising Néstor Almendros’ “sublime” cinematography and Ennio Morricone’s “elegiac” musical score.

But Does It Really?: This is another NFR entry I would partially preserve. That cinematography? Print out each frame and hang it in a museum. That score? Have it playing on a loop in the same museum. Everything else about this movie? It’s fine. Ultimately, “Days of Heaven” is remembered for specific elements that are so good they help make up for the less successful story beats, plus compared to Malick’s other NFR entry “Badlands”, “Days” is more in line with what we think of as a “Terrence Malick movie”. I understand the NFR induction of “Days of Heaven” (it is beloved and respected enough that its absence would be too conspicuous), but personally it’s not my thing.

Shout Outs: Abby, Linda, and the Farmer briefly watch a scene from Charlie Chaplin’s “The Immigrant”.

Title Track: The film’s working title was “Stay Hungry”, which co-producer Harold Schneider used for his 1976 bodybuilding movie starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. The title “Days of Heaven” was taken from a Bible passage; something about the land being heaven on earth. Deuteronomy: Look it up.

Seriously, Oscars?: “Days of Heaven” received four Oscar nominations, winning one for Néstor Almendros’ cinematography. To date, this is the sole Oscar win for a Terrence Malick film. Even more surprising, Ennio Morricone’s nod for Original Score was his first Oscar nomination ever, and it would be another 28 years and four nominations before they finally gave him a lifetime achievement Oscar (he would also win a competitive Oscar for 2015’s “The Hateful Eight”).

Other notes 

  • When we last saw Terrence Malick on this blog, he had achieved critical success with “Badlands”. While on vacation in Cuba in 1975, Malick talked with Bert (brother of the aforementioned Harold) Schneider about possible story ideas for his next movie, which led to what would become “Days of Heaven”. Schneider was able to use his recent clout from “Hearts and Minds” to get this unorthodox project set up at Paramount.
  • Production took a full year from 1976 to 1977 in Alberta, Canada. Two weeks into shooting, Malick, unhappy with the results, threw the script out and began shooting as much footage as possible, hoping to fix everything in post, which took nearly two years!
  • The opening credits feature one of my favorite pieces of music: “Aquarium” from Camille Saint-Saëns’ “Carnival of the Animals”. I always associate it with this Criterion commercial, and therefore classic movies in general.
  • Richard Gere is giving a very different performance than his later work, but then again it’s a very different movie from his later work, too. Malick originally wanted John Travolta for Bill, but Travolta couldn’t make it work with his “Welcome Back, Kotter” schedule. “Days” was one of Gere’s first movies, though he filmed his breakout performances in “Looking for Mr. Goodbar” and “Bloodbrothers” during the “Days” lengthy post-production.
  • At first I thought that the Farmer’s house was the Benedict estate from “Giant”, but it turns out it was made specifically for this film by production designer Jack Fisk.
  • It’s time to praise the many beautiful compositions of Néstor Almendros. What helps make this movie’s cinematography stick out is the reliance on natural light, giving the film a more earthy, modern quality. It also helps that much of the film is shot during “magic hour”. Everything looks better with a sunset sky as your backdrop. Bonus shoutout to  Haskell Wexler, credited here as “additional photography”. Turns out Almendros had to leave production halfway through, and Wexler came in to complete the project, filming by his estimation more than half of the finished film. While Wexler was initially pissed about not receiving a co-cinematographer credit, he eventually came to accept that he was ultimately carrying out Almendros’ vision for the film rather than his own.
  • I always used to get this movie mixed up with “Heaven’s Gate”, Michael Cimino’s epic period piece from around the same time that killed the New Hollywood movement once and for all. There’s a little bit of overlap between the two movies (both are profiled in Peter Biskind’s “Easy Riders, Raging Bulls”) but watching “Days” made me see that they are very different films.
  • One of the ways Malick “fixed it in post” was scrapping most of the film’s dialogue and filling any gaps with improvised narration/commentary from Linda Manz as Bill’s little sister. I’m not quite sure it works, especially given her thick Chicagoan accent. 
  • On a related note, I appreciate the film’s spare usage of dialogue, but it means everything is conveyed through subtle glances and camera compositions. I had to stay on my toes during this viewing.
  • This is a good point to reiterate that the film is an original screenplay and not, as I assumed based on the film’s epic yet meandering tone, an adaptation from a novel. 
  • Much like Gere’s performance, it’s hard to judge Brooke Adams’ work because the movie she made during production is not the same movie that got released. But I think she’s doing okay as the object of everyone’s affection. Fun Fact; Brooke Adams is married to Tony Shalhoub!
  • The brother/sister thing is a weird plot point to have. Just…why? I guess the idea of two adults not being married was just too much for people in 1916.
  • The locust invasion is probably the film’s highlight, and contains the most repeated bit of trivia about this movie: The shot of the locusts flying out of the field was filmed by dropping peanut shells onto the field and then playing the footage in reverse. To everyone’s credit, I didn’t notice any of the trickery involved. Well done, Malick.
  • I love seeing which random people get mentioned in a movie’s Special Thanks section of the credits, and “Days of Heaven” has a doozy: Redd Foxx! Apparently a punchline from Foxx’s stand-up act is used in the film, which required Foxx’s permission. Definitely missed that.

Legacy 

  • “Days of Heaven” was released in September 1978, and while it didn’t make its money back, it went over okay with critics, who loved the cinematography, if not the story. In the ensuing decades, the film received a reevaluation from critics and historians, and its reception in recent years has been much more positive.
  • In addition to its Oscar win, “Days of Heaven” played at the 1979 Cannes Film Festival, where Terrence Malick won their Best Director prize, one of the rare Americans to do so.
  • Following “Days of Heaven”, Terrence Malick began work on his next film “Q”, which ultimately fell through. In the early ‘80s, Malick moved to Paris, and although he continued writing screenplays, none of them were produced. Malick spent nearly a decade trying to make a film adaptation of “The Thin Red Line”, which was finally released in 1998, a full 20 years after “Days of Heaven”.