Author: thehorsesheadblog

One of the harder NFR entries to track down, “Please, Don’t Bury Me Alive!” has finally made its way online. Thanks as always to resident NFR tracker Benjamin Wilson for finding this film.

The Plot: Alejandro Hernández (Efrain Gutiérrez) is a young Chicano in San Antonio, Texas, struggling with what to do with his life. Having recently buried his older brother Ricardo (Richard Garza), who died while fighting in Vietnam, Alejandro begins meditating on what it means to be Chicano in a White man’s world. Low on money, Alejandro resorts to a life of crime, starting with robberies and eventually getting involved in a heroin deal. But that’s just scratching the surface of a film billed as the first Chicano feature ever made.

Why It Matters: The NFR write-up gives some historical context for the film, with a quote from Chon Noriega of the UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center, who salutes the film for being “important as an instance of regional filmmaking, [and] as a bicultural and bilingual narrative”.

But Does It Really?: I had to sit with “Please, Don’t Bury Me Alive!” for awhile after my viewing. On the one hand, “Please Don’t” is definitely one of the NFR’s rougher entries in terms of production value, with some pretty raw guerrilla filmmaking through the streets of San Antonio. On the other hand, while there are other films on the NFR covering the Chicano movement of the early ‘70s, this film feels more like a counterargument to those other films. The likes of “I Am Joaquín” and “Chicana” highlight the perseverance and optimism of the movement, but “Please Don’t” takes a more realistic, pessimistic approach, which is an obvious downer, but I found it more compelling to watch. While “Please, Don’t Bury Me Alive!” isn’t the most entertaining or polished film on the Registry, it has the unique qualities I’m looking for in a good entry. I support the film’s NFR induction, and I’m equally glad that it has finally shown up online.

Everybody Gets One: Born in San Antonio, Efrain Gutiérrez moved around a lot as a child while his family looked for migrant work throughout the midwest. A move to L.A. saw Gutiérrez enroll at East Los Angeles College, where he first took theater classes. Upon his return to San Antonio, Gutiérrez founded his own theater company and began making films. Gutiérrez was inspired to make “Please, Don’t Bury Me Alive!” after he witnessed a friend receive a 10-year prison sentence for drug possession after seeing a White person receive a shorter sentence for the same crime. 

Hello dear readers,

This is typically the point in the year where the Library of Congress announces its 25 newest inductees to the National Film Registry and I take a closer look at which movies I’ll be forcing myself to watch over the next few years. Unfortunately, in keeping with how the rest of 2025 has gone, things are a bit different this year.

It was revealed last week at the annual Associate of Moving Image Archivist conference (AMIA 2025) that the next NFR announcement has been delayed until late January 2026 due to the ongoing impact of the federal government shutdown. While I find this very disappointing, at least it’s a confirmation that there will in fact be an NFR announcement, and we all just have to wait a little longer.

So what does that mean for The Horse’s Head? Last week’s “Purple Rain” post was always meant to be my final regular post of the year, and I’ll be taking my usual time off for the holidays. The Horse’s Head will return in January, but in lieu of the Class of 2025 I’ll be posting some write-ups that are already “in the can” (including one of the NFR’s most elusive titles). Once the Class of 2025/2026 is announced, I’ll start adding these new movies into the rotation. So…business as usual I guess.

That all being said, this is my last update to the blog for 2025, so I will take this time to thank all of you for making this hands-down the most successful year in The Horse’s Head’s nine year history. I still think of this blog as something I write just to entertain myself, so seeing other people discover and share my work is an honor I don’t take for granted. Very special thanks to the Knights of the NFR: finders of obscure films and authors of the never-ending email thread. Always a pleasure seeing that new message in my inbox.

One more thing before I go: As some of you may know, the National Film Preservation Act (the laws that make the NFR happen) is currently set to expire at the end of FY26. While it has always been renewed in years past, I don’t need to remind you that we are living in very different times. I’m choosing to stay optimistic, but as a precaution please consider reaching out to your local member of Congress to make sure they help continue this nearly 40 year tradition of honoring significant American films. I know it’s not the most important item on anyone’s list, but whenever art of any kind is celebrated, everyone wins. Fingers crossed we’ll be gathered here this time next year to talk about the Class of 2026, with many more to come.

The Plot: The Kid (Prince) performs with his funk rock band The Revolution nightly at the First Avenue club in Minneapolis. One night, he meets aspiring performer Apollonia (Apollonia Kotero) and after some initial resistance, the two begin a romantic relationship. Apollonia is also being wooed by Morris Day (Morris Day), the lead singer of rival group The Time who wants Apollonia for a girl group that can take over The Revolution’s house band slot at First Avenue. As working relationships within The Revolution become strained, Prince struggles to come up with a new song while simultaneously dealing with his new relationship and the escalating fights between his parents (Clarence Williams III & Olga Karlatos). And if none of that interests you, there’s still plenty of prime Prince music to hold your attention.

Why It Matters: The NFR gives “Purple Rain” its proper historical context, calling it the film that “secured [Prince’s] place as a movie star and entertainment legend.”

But Does It Really?: Sometimes I have to remind myself that the NFR’s criteria is films that are “culturally, historically or aesthetically significant”. Nowhere does it say that these films need to be good; such is the case with “Purple Rain”. As a narrative feature it’s a mess, impeded by Prince’s stilted acting and some increasingly problematic story beats. But “Purple Rain” didn’t make the NFR based on its strength as a film, but rather as representation of Prince: one of the most prolific, influential artists of this or any time. If you’re a Prince fan, “Purple Rain” is a perfect ‘80s time-capsule, and while the film itself is far from essential, Prince’s sheer star-power makes “Purple Rain” an undeniably iconic moment in pop culture.

Everybody Gets One: Easily the least mid-western person to ever come out of Minnesota, Prince Rogers Nelson was named after his father John L. Nelson’s stage name from his jazz pianist days – Prince Rogers. Prince started writing music and playing guitar in his childhood, and by 19 his demo recordings landed him a contract with Warner Bros. Records. By the early ‘80s, Prince (with his band The Revolution) had scored such hits as “I Wanna Be Your Lover”, “1999”, and “Little Red Corvette”, and made it known to his management that he wouldn’t renew his contract unless he could star in a movie. Prince wrote the initial treatment himself before handing it off to screenwriter William Blinn, whose screenplay was originally titled “Dreams”.

Title Track: “Purple Rain” was conceived as a country song Prince would co-write with Stevie Nicks. When Nicks backed out, Prince collaborators Wendy & Lisa gave it a more rock ballad feel, and the rest is history. As for the title, Prince’s description is a continuation of his religious influence, with a blue sky turning red ahead of Judgement Day, creating purple rain.

Seriously, Oscars?: Although none of the individual songs in “Purple Rain” received an Oscar nomination, Prince won an Oscar in the category of Original Song Score. Side note: The Song Score category technically still exists, now known as Best Musical, and is only presented when enough original musicals are released in a calendar year for the Academy’s music branch to “activate” the category. 1984 was the last year this award was handed out, and given the dearth of original movie musicals in the last 40 years, “Purple Rain” is most likely the category’s final recipient. 

• While there are many biographical elements in “Purple Rain”, I can’t find anything suggesting that Prince’s home life was as horrendous as depicted here. Shoutout to Clarence Williams III for proving there’s life after “Mod Squad”.
• And then Apollonia proves her devotion to the Kid but stripping down and cleansing herself in Lake Minnetonka. Maybe I’ve been too hasty condemning this movie…
• Prince’s cold working relationship with band members Wendy & Lisa is not too far from real life, with Prince more-or-less firing the two when he dissolved The Revolution in 1986. Although Wendy Melvoin and Lisa Coleman are no longer romantically involved with each other, they continue to collaborate on their music to this day.

• If you haven’t picked up on it yet, this movie has some serious issues with women: Spousal abuse, verbal harassment, plus the scene where Morris’ assistant Jerome throws a woman in a dumpster! Many critics have complained about this film’s misogynistic streak since its release, with a recent article for Far Out Magazine suggesting the film should be removed from the NFR! While this point is well taken, I’m here to tell you: If you removed every movie on the NFR with this much mistreatment of women, there’d only be about three movies left. I’m not saying that any of this is acceptable, but it is an unfortunate part of our cultural heritage and a reminder that we can and must do better. 
• Random thing I found in my research: Replicas of that weird cone puppet Prince talks to/for were sold exclusively during the “Purple Rain” tour in 1984-1985, with one recently selling on eBay for $4000!
• This is what it looks like when montages cry. Turns out this film’s random mid-movie montage is carrying on a long-standing film tradition: montages made up of scenes cut from the movie. Prince wrote “When Doves Cry” to cover the montage, which explains the song’s vague movie-related lyrics (“Maybe I’m just like my father”). Astonishingly, “When Doves Cry” was the breakout single of the “Purple Rain” album upon its release.

• “Darling Nikki” is easily the dirtiest song in the movie, and had an unintentional impact on our culture. In 1985, future second lady Tipper Gore heard her 11 year old daughter Karenna listening to this song, and long story short, records now have the “Parental Advisory” sticker for explicit content.

• Apollonia’s solo number “Sex Shooter” is definitely the film’s low-point, but it’s an appropriate time to point out that “Purple Rain” is one of two NFR movies to receive a Razzie nomination (the other is “The Shining”). Apollonia Kotero was nominated for Worst New Star, and “Sex Shooter” was up for Worst Song. While it lost both categories, I won’t disagree with these nominations.
• Prince clearly has a penchant for capes; both he and Apollonia wear them at different points in the movie.  Is it any wonder he did the songs for “Batman”?
• Yes, the performance of “Purple Rain” is iconic, but at this point in my viewing I was ready for it to all be over. Prince follows up “Purple Rain” with two encores, some sort of phallic guitar hose, the mandated freeze-frame ending all good ‘80s movies have, and credits that feature the entire album on shuffle.

• There’s no way I can cover all of Prince’s post-“Purple Rain” career in a brief paragraph. Suffice it to say he continued being an untouchable rock icon until his unexpected death in 2016, leaving behind a legacy of music and more unfinished projects than Orson Welles. The NFR induction of “Purple Rain” is just one of countless posthumous honors Prince has received.
• Although Albert Magnoli only directed a handful of movies in his career, his work on “Purple Rain” kept him in Prince’s orbit through the rest of the ‘80s; directing some of his music videos, ghost-directing his concert film “Sign o’ the Times”, and even serving as his manager for a few months in 1989!

• Tangentially related, but worth a mention: During a contractual dispute with Warner Bros. in the early 1990s, Prince refused to perform under his stage name, opting instead for the unpronounceable “Love Symbol” and being referred to as “The Artist Formerly Known as Prince”. Late-night comedians had a field day with that one.
• While “Purple Rain” still gets referenced throughout pop culture, I would argue it’s the album and not necessarily the movie that’s getting the nod. The legacy of “Purple Rain” was summed up best by Agent Mulder in a 1997 episode of “The X-Files”: “Great album. Deeply flawed movie, though.”

Listen to This: The “Purple Rain” album made the National Recording Registry in 2011, with the NRR calling it “provocative and controversial”. Guest essayist Eddie Santiago provides a thorough write-up on the production and impact of “Purple Rain”.

December 16^th, 2003: Before heading off to midnight screenings of “Return of the King”, the Library of Congress throws 25 more movies into the National Film Registry, bringing the grand total to 375 films. I’ve just finished watching all 25, and here is my regular recap. In chronological order, here’s the Class of 2003:

• The Dickson Experimental Sound Film (1894): “the earliest known attempt to synch film with sound”
• Princess Nicotine; or, The Smoke Fairy (1909): “confusing, but man are those special effects a sight to behold.”
• Matrimony’s Speed Limit (1913): “not very entertaining today…[but] is one of a handful of surviving films from Alice Guy-Blanché”
• The Chechahcos (1923): “Its Alaskan production claim might be this film’s sole reason for making the NFR”
• The Son of the Sheik (1926): “I just don’t understand why the NFR didn’t induct “The Sheik” first (and as of this writing, still hasn’t).” “It don’t make no sense.”
• Fox Movietone News: Jenkins Orphanage Band (1928): “the only footage available online is 10 minutes of outtakes.” “Does the final newsreel still exist?”
• Show People (1928): “a funny love letter to early Hollywood.”
• The Wedding March (1928): “an intriguing behind-the-scenes story, but ultimately a viewing experience reserved solely for film buffs.”
• Gold Diggers of 1933 (1933): “how can you say no to the musical that gave us ‘We’re in the Money’?”
• Tarzan and His Mate (1934): “this Tarzan is a perfect representation of the overall series.”
• Naughty Marietta (1935): “the kind of escapist romantic movie musicals that delighted Depression-era audiences.”
• Young Mr. Lincoln (1939): “As a biopic it’s a bit on the nose…[a]s courtroom drama it’s a bit more engaging…[a]s a classic film worthy of preservation, I have my doubts”. [Note from the future: Jeez, that was harsh. I don’t remember hating this film that much, or at all.]
• National Velvet (1944): “a sweet, genuinely heartfelt movie”
• White Heat (1949): “an entertainingly tense, well-scripted entry in the [gangster] genre.”
• One Froggy Evening (1955): “still really funny with solid animation” “Who am I to say no?”
• The Hunters (1957): “I did not start this blog so I could watch a giraffe snuff film.”
• Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969): “a continuation of New Hollywood’s deconstruction of the classic Western”.
• Medium Cool (1969): “a chance to see what happens when [Haskell] Wexler has full control over a movie.”
• Patton (1970): “an iconic piece of filmmaking”
• (nostalgia) (1971): “deceivingly simple, yet quite thought-provoking.”
• Film Portrait (1972): “a thoughtful, entertaining memoir”.
• Antonia: A Portrait of the Woman (1974): “a tribute to an unsung artist who finally got her moment in the sun”
• Young Frankenstein (1974): “not only one of the funniest films ever, but also a frontrunner for best parody ever.”
• Atlantic City (1980): “I’m a sucker for a well-acted character study”
• Tin Toy (1988): “an important stepping stone movie in the history of Pixar”.

Other notes

• The big news at the time was the reauthorization of the National Film Preservation Act in November 2003 (cutting it a little close for that December announcement, but it all worked out). There weren’t too many amendments this time, other than language to encourage public accessibility to Registry titles, as well as their inclusion in the collection at the National Audio-Visual Conservation Center in Culpeper, Virginia. Also, in a surprising move, Congress actually gave the National Film Preservation Board more money! Appropriations to the NFPB at the time were $250,000 a year, with the reauthorization allotting $500,000 annually to the Board in 2004 and 2005, and then up to $1,000,000 a year through 2013. While those figures would get lowered again in a 2008 amendment, they wouldn’t be lowered to pre-2003 amounts, so that’s still a win for everyone.
• The NFR Class of 2003 is a continuation of the “minor classic”/“what isn’t on the list yet” path the Registry traveled for most of the 2000s. A few iconic titles are here, but mostly encores from artists already represented (another Cagney gangster pic, another Busby Berkeley backstage musical, another Mel Brooks comedy, etc). The Class of 2003 checks off a few more missing bits of American film history with a Tarzan movie, an Eddy/MacDonald musical, a Rudolph Valentino vehicle (though arguably the wrong one), and the first Pixar short on the list. In addition, the NFR still made room for films by such lesser-known filmmakers as Hollis Frampton, as well as unique titles like “Princess Nicotine” and “The Chechahcos”.
• My posts on these 25 films can be summed up in two words: “I guess.” There’s only a handful of these films that I unconditionally support for NFR inclusion in these write-ups, and the rest are a series of passes I gave for historical or cultural significance, with one or two whose inclusion I questioned outright. Once again: I don’t recall hating “Young Mr. Lincoln” that much, but that post was pretty early in my run so perhaps a re-watch is in order. 
• Side note: In my “Atlantic City” post I slam anti-vaxxers a full year before the COVID-19 pandemic. I am nothing if not consistent. 
• Shoutout to 1894’s “The Dickson Experimental Sound Film”, which at the time was the earliest film on the Registry. It would hold this distinction for seven years before being supplanted by the current record-holder: 1891’s “Newark Athlete”.
• At the time of the NFR announcement, “The Last Samurai” was number one at the U.S. box office. No current NFR titles were playing in theaters, but the sequel to one was: “The Matrix Revolutions”. Other notable titles in theaters included “Elf”, “Somethings Gotta Give”, “Master and Commander”, “School of Rock”, and “Love Actually” (which is mercifully ineligible for the NFR).
• Quite a few Double-Dippers in the Class of 2003. Among them: actors Peter Boyle, Cloris Leachman, and Kenneth Mars, art directors Cedric Gibbons and A. Arnold “Buddy” Gillespie, editor John C. Howard, and possibly Robert Z. Leonard (he has a cameo as himself in “Show People” and was the original director of “Naughty Marietta” for literally one day).
• Thematic double-dippers: Portraits (Both “Film” and “of the Woman”), historical biopics, extraordinary animals, unhappy engagements/arranged marriages, train robberies with explosives, the descendants of more famous characters, gold diggers both literal and figurative, entries set/filmed in Africa, pie fights, films made explicitly to test new technology, and the song “Ah! Sweet Mystery of Life”
• Favorites of my own subtitles: Fear and Loathing in Los Anchorage, Polly Parker Pranks a Pair of Pickled Patrons, Strong Arm of the Ma, Ol’ Blood and Guts is Back, Burn After Filming, and A Movie-able Feast.
• As always, I’m at a loss for how to end these recaps, so here’s Michigan J. Frog! It was either him or the “Tin Toy” baby, so consider yourself lucky.

The Plot: Tinny is a small one-man-band toy excited for playtime, until he sees that the child who wants to play with him is a slobbering infant whose idea of playing involves putting toys in his mouth and throwing them across the room. Tinny tries to hide from the baby, but soon showcases the first instance of Pixar asking the question, “What if toys had feelings?”

Why It Matters: The NFR hails the film as “one of Pixar’s best short subjects” despite its “clunky foray into human characters”. I’ve read some backhanded compliments from the NFR in my time, but this one takes the cake. You never want an organization like the NFR to use the word “clunky” when describing your contribution to American culture.

But Does It Really?: If it’s 2003 and Pixar is in its creative prime and “Toy Story” isn’t NFR eligible for another two years, then “Tin Toy” is a natural choice to represent Pixar on the list. Like “Luxo Jr.” before it, “Tin Toy” is an important stepping stone movie in the history of Pixar. The technology is crude by modern standards (and don’t worry, we’ll get to the baby), but the film serves as an incubator for the kind of heartfelt, original storytelling the studio would later perfect in its features. A pass for “Tin Toy” on the NFR.

Shout Outs: Look quickly for a picture of Luxo Jr. hanging on the wall. Because who doesn’t have a framed photo of a lamp hanging in their living room?

Seriously, Oscars?: In 1989, “Tin Toy” won the Oscar for Best Animated Short, the first computer-animated short to take home the prize. The clip below not only includes the presentation for Best Animated Short (and the acceptance speech by co-producers John Lasseter and William Reeves), but also for Best Live-Action Short, which went to “The Appointment of Dennis Jennings”, produced by Dean Parisot and Steven Wright. Yes, that Steven Wright.

• This is the second film I’ve covered this year that has “The Price is Right” playing in the background. We are one step closer to inducting that “Price is Right” episode where that lady’s tube top falls off.
• My god that is one creepy looking baby. It’s like a cross between a possessed baby doll and a raisin. It’s so horrifying it distracts from the short’s otherwise excellent animation, especially Tinny’s characterization. In all fairness, Pixar wasn’t pleased with the baby’s final look either. The limited production timeline of “Tin Toy” prevented Pixar from perfecting some of the baby’s details (primarily its movement, which is very stiff in the final film), though believe it or not they were able to refine its face, which apparently looked even worse in the beginning. Also in everyone’s defense, it would take about another decade before computer-animation technology could handle more realistic human characters.
• The short makes up for its anticlimactic ending with some interesting credits. Several longtime Pixar employees get mentioned here, as does a “Very, Very Special Thanks” to Steve Jobs. There’s also a section called “Babies John Looked at a Lot”; which definitely could use a retitling. It’s also worth freeze-framing the legal disclaimer at the end for such extra details as “Seatbelts save lives”, “This bag is not a toy”, and an addendum to the standard no illegal reproduction disclaimer: “or we won’t be your friends anymore.” Even with their hectic production schedule, its nice to see the Pixar team retained its sense of humor.

• Pixar has made a few references to “Tin Toy” in their subsequent work over the years, most notably Tinny’s cameo in “Toy Story 4”. While a harmless nod to Pixar’s own history, this easter egg has led to the fan theory that “Tin Toy” is a “Toy Story” prequel and that the baby is actually Andy. Please people, not everything is connected in a cinematic universe.

• “Tin Toy” is one of the first in a long line of memorable Pixar shorts. Personal favorites include “Geri’s Game”, “Bao”, “Presto”, and that “Toy Story” short at the fast-food restaurant with the very random “Condorman” reference. I can’t believe anyone remembers “Condorman”.