#663) Tevya (1939)

#663) Tevya (1939)

OR “Fiddle Me This”

Directed and Written by Maurice Schwartz. Based on the “Tevye the Dairyman” short stories by Sholem Aleichem.

Class of 1991

The Plot: In the Russian Empire village of Anatevka Boyberik circa 1905, the dairyman Tevya (Maurice Schwartz) balances his devout Judaism with the increasing anti-Semitism of the Russian government. His daughter Chava (Miriam Riselle) has started seeing Fedya (Leon Liebold), an intelligent Christian, which infuriates Tevya and his equally devout wife Golde (Rebecca Weintraub). Despite the pleading of her parents, Chava marries Fedya, and Tevya declares her dead to him, never to spoken of or remembered again. When the town council announces the immediate expulsion of all Jews from the village, Tevya grapples with his place in the world. Sholem Aleichem’s most famous character comes to the screen in this Yiddish production that’s all about traditiooooon. Tradition. Bump-ba-da-dum-dum-bump-ba-da-dum-dum-bump tradition.

Why It Matters: For starters, the NFR’s official listing names the film “Tevye”, with “Tevya” being listed as an alternate title (the print I watched is titled “Tevya”, so that’s what I’m going with). Other than that, the NFR writeup is just a plot summary and its connections to “Fiddler on the Roof”. An essay by film critic J. Hoberman is a detailed history of the film’s production and reception.

But Does It Really?:  This in another one of those movies where I get why it’s on the Registry, but I was more interested in the story behind the film than entertained by the film itself. “Tevya” is the first foreign-language movie to be inducted into the Registry, and represents a culture that was in serious danger of being wiped out in the upcoming war. It also helps that there is a significantly more iconic adaptation of the same material keeping this film’s memory afloat, but more on that later. “Tevya” is an historically important piece of American film, and its unique presentation helps it stand out among other NFR movies. It’s worth a watch for film/Yiddish theater buffs, but everyone else can just watch the musical instead.

Everybody Gets One: Avrom Moishe Schwartz emigrated to New York City in 1901, changing his name to Maurice shortly thereafter. As a teenager, Schwartz became fascinated by the Yiddish theater, and spent years working odd jobs until he could afford to become a full-time actor. In 1918, Schwartz founded the Yiddish Art Theatre, with a goal of presenting both classics and new works to a Yiddish audience. In 1919, Schwartz first played the role of Tevye on stage in a production directed by himself and based on an adaptation Sholem Aleichem penned shortly before his death. Almost twenty years later, Schwartz returned to the role of Tevye for the film adaptation, which he felt compelled to make in response to the wave of anti-Semitism sweeping Europe throughout the 1930s.

Seriously, Oscars?:  No Oscar attention for “Tevya”, but its successor “Fiddler on the Roof” fared much better: Eight nominations and three wins.

Other notes 

  • Solomon-Olesksii Naumovich Rabinovich had been writing stories since the age of 15, when he adopted the pen name Sholem Aleichem (a Yiddish version of the Hebrew phrase meaning “peace be with you”). By the time the first “Tevye” story in 1894, Aleichem was already a celebrated figure in Yiddish literature, dubbed by some as “the Jewish Mark Twain”. Like Tevye, Aleichem lived in the Russian Empire at the turn of the century, witnessed the violent pogroms on Kyiv in 1905, and emigrated shortly afterwards. Aleichem wrote eight Tevye stories, the last being published in 1914, two years before his death. The 1939 film is primarily an adaptation of the fifth story “Chava” and the eighth “Lekh-Lekho” (aka “Get Thee Out”), with one brief interlude from the first story – “Tevye Strikes It Rich” – added to the film’s beginning.
  • “Tevya” was made on a budget of $70,000 (roughly 1.5 million today), financed primarily by Schwartz and a group of friends. Shooting took place in the summer of 1939 on a 130-acre potato farm in Long Island. In late August 1939, the Nazis seized the city-state of Danzig with the invasion of Poland happening the following week. Many on the “Tevya” production team had family in Poland, and despite the political anxiety, filming was completed shortly thereafter.
  • As previously mentioned, “Tevya” is one of the rare non-English language films on the NFR, presented primarily in Yiddish, with some Ukrainian and Russian sprinkled throughout. It makes the entire film feel more authentic, therefore making the characters feel more dimensional and more sympathetic for a viewing audience. And shoutout to whoever did the English subtitles on the Kino Lorber restoration; the translation has some character to it, retaining the spirit of Aleichem’s prose rather than just being a copy-and-paste Google Translate.
  • It was such a relief to see a film this Jewish from this point in history. In the late 1930s, Hollywood strategically shied away from overt Jewish depictions for fear of their films being banned in Nazi Germany and losing money. It’s unfortunate that the only way an openly Jewish film could be made at this time was an independent production, but you can feel the sense that this team had to make this film at this exact moment in time; a flaunting to the anti-Semites of the world as if to say “We’re here and we’re not going anywhere.”
  • As with many other films based on short stories, you can sense the padding in “Tevya”. There’s a lot of scenes of Tevya giving extended monologues about his feelings towards his daughter’s marriage and the world around him, but after a while it feels less and less earned. I suspect they opted for this rather than adding more of the original stories into the film in order to save money (Tevya goes from seven daughters to two in this version, and there isn’t a matchmaker, matchmaker in sight).
  • The moment when Tevya yells at Tzeitel “I have no other daughters!” got an unintentional laugh out of me. Poor Hodel, to say nothing of Shprintze, Beilke, Taybele, and the unnamed seventh one that’s only mentioned in the first story.
  • [Spoilers] For those of us (including myself) more familiar with the musical than the original stories, it’s surprising that this movie is even more of a downer. For starters, Golde dies! Like the stories, this movie ends with Tevya and his family being evicted from the town, although the film (and the musical) remove the ambiguous ending and let Tevya reconcile with Chava. In the end, “Tevya” is essentially an extended melodrama. A good melodrama, I grant you that, but still.

Legacy 

  • “Tevya” premiered in New York City on December 21st, 1939. The Yiddish papers that reviewed the film were in near agreement that while the film as a whole was quite powerful (especially Schwartz’s performance), it departed too drastically from the source material to be considered a success. Although the film had been deemed lost for decades, a print was rediscovered in 1978.
  • After “Tevya”, Maurice Schwartz returned to the theater, though Yiddish theater was slowly dying due to the ongoing assimilation of its audience. Schwartz performed on Broadway and in a few Hollywood movies before his death in 1960 at age 69.
  • There have been multiple adaptations of the “Tevye” short stories before and after the 1939 film, but of course the best known is the musical “Fiddler on the Roof”. With a score by Jerry Bock and Sheldon Harnick and a book by Joseph Stein, “Fiddler” adapted the material for a post-Holocaust generation, and subsequently became the longest running Broadway musical of its time. There have been revivals all over the world, including five on Broadway, and a successful film adaptation in 1971 by Norman Jewison. It’s worth noting that as of this writing, the 1971 film has not made the NFR. That’s gotta be an oversight, right?

Listen to This: The original Broadway cast recording of “Fiddler on the Roof” made the National Recording Registry in 2019. “Fiddler” expert Alisa Solomon is on hand with an essay that delves into the score and the album’s recording session.

The NFR Class of 2023: My Ballot

It’s that time of year again; when the National Film Board Preservation meets to determine this year’s NFR inductees and I post my ballot as a not-so-subtle attempt to sway their votes. Here are my 50 picks for films that deserve to be on the Registry. Movies with an * are movies I’m nominating this year for the first time.

The Five Timers Club (Movies that I have nominated at least five times but have yet to make it): 9 to 5 (1980), Big (1988), It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World (1963), The Miracle Worker (1962), Mystery Science Theater 3000: The Movie (1996), The Sixth Sense (1999)

Personal Favorites: Rope (1948), Witness for the Prosecution (1957), Exploratorium (1974), Hardware Wars (1978), Clue (1985), Home Alone (1990), The Birdcage (1996), Best in Show (2000), Hedwig and the Angry Inch (2001)

A Favorite that Should at Least Be on the List of Eligible Titles on the NFR’s Website: Original Cast Album: Company (1970)

Animation!: Humorous Phases of Funny Faces (1906), Feline Follies (1919)*, Der Fuehrer’s Face (1942), Cat Concerto (1947)*, Alice in Wonderland (1951), Winnie the Pooh and the Honey Tree (1966)*, The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993), Space Jam (1996)*, Finding Nemo (2003)

A Whole Buncha ’80s: Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982), Gremlins (1984)*, The Karate Kid (1984), The Color Purple (1985), Blue Velvet (1986), Labyrinth (1986), Dirty Dancing (1987), Fatal Attraction (1987), Beetlejuice (1988), Say Anything… (1989)*

Grab Bag: The Wolf Man (1941)*, Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954), The Great Escape (1963), Fantastic Voyage (1966)*, The Heartbreak Kid (1972)* Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore (1974), Sleepless in Seattle (1993), Cast Away (2000)*, O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000)*, Moulin Rouge! (2001)*, Borat (2006)*, 300 (2007)*, Bridesmaids (2011)

And finally, the Newly Eligible from 2013: 12 Years a Slave (2013)*, Frozen (2013)*

On average, three of the movies on my nominations ballot make the cut. Which ones will it be? Can I beat my personal best of getting five films on the list in one year? And is anyone on the National Film Preservation Board actually reading this? We’ll find out the answers to all of these questions in December.

Happy viewing,

Tony

#662) The Prisoner of Zenda (1937)

#662) The Prisoner of Zenda (1937)

OR “The Heir Apparent Trap”

Directed by John Cromwell

Written by John L. Balderston. Adaptation by Wells Root. Additional dialogue by Donald Ogden Stewart. Based on the novel by Anthony Hope and the stage adaptation by Edward Rose.

Class of 1991

Wow, no trailer to be found for this version of “Zenda”, so here’s an introduction to the film by one of those new TCM hosts.

The Plot: Englishman Rudolf Rassendyll (Ronald Colman) takes a vacation in the fictional European country Ruritania in the summer of 1897. He soon discovers that he looks nearly identical to Ruritania’s King Rudolf the V (also Ronald Colman), soon to be coronated and wed to Princess Flavia (Madeleine Carroll). Amused by their resemblance, King Rudolf invites Rudolf to dine with him on the eve of his coronation, where the king drinks a bottle of wine from his half-brother Michael (Raymond Massey) and is drugged. Worried that Michael will try to overtake the throne while Rudolph V is incapacitated, Colonel Zapt and Captain von Tarlenheim (C. Aubrey Smith and David Niven) convince Rudolf to fill in for the king for the coronation. Shortly afterwards, the real king is kidnapped by Michael’s henchman Rupert of Hentzau (Douglas Fairbanks Jr.) and held prisoner in the nearby village of Zenda. There’s action, romance, and some impressive optical effects in the kind of historical adventure that could only come from 1930s Hollywood.

Why It Matters: The NFR write-up is mostly a rundown of the film’s plot and production, with the only superlative going to the movie’s “escapist charm”.

But Does It Really?: This is another one of those movies that I think made the NFR a little sooner than it should have. I enjoyed “Zenda” quite a bit as an entertaining example of a Classic Hollywood studio adventure, but this should not be part of the same NFR class as “2001” and “Lawrence of Arabia“. While “Zenda” succeeds at being a charming historical romp, there are just so many other movies of the era that do it better (the Errol Flynn “Robin Hood” came out the next year). Also not helping things is the fact that no one reads or remembers the original novel of “Prisoner of Zenda”, so its cultural footprint isn’t what it was when this film was made. “Zelda” is fun if you’re willing to track it down, but I’d hardly call it a film essential, and I give its NFR designation a hearty “I guess?”

Everybody Gets One: John Cromwell started off as a stage actor, pivoting to directing before heading out to Hollywood as a dialogue director for this new thing called talking pictures. Cromwell pivoted to film director quickly, earning a reputation as an actor’s director. Fun Fact: John Cromwell is the father of the actor James Cromwell. This is also the only NFR appearance for leading lady Madeleine Carroll, whose most iconic film appearance is ineligible for this list: Hitchcock’s original 1935 version of “The 39 Steps”. Carroll retired from acting shortly after the war to focus on humanitarian efforts, and considered “Zenda” her favorite of her own film work.

Seriously, Oscars?: A hit upon release, “The Prisoner of Zenda” received two Oscar nominations. The film lost Art Direction to fellow NFR entry/Ronald Colman vehicle “Lost Horizon“, and Original Score to something called “One Hundred Men and a Girl”.

Other notes 

  • “The Prisoner of Zenda” was written by Anthony Hope in 1894 and was immediately successful, spawning a sequel novel and a popular stage adaptation. Prior to the 1937 film, there had been three silent film adaptations, most notably a 1922 version starring Lewis Stone and Ramón Navarro. In the early 1930s, the film rights to the “Zenda” were owned by MGM (its predecessor Metro Pictures made the 1922 version), and there were plans to make a musical adaptation starring Jeanette MacDonald and Nelson Eddy. A non-musical film to be produced by David O. Selznick was in production turnaround when Selznick left MGM to form his own studio, but his interest in the property was reignited when King Edward VIII abdicated the British throne in December 1936 to marry American divorcée Wallis Simpson. Recognizing the parallel story themes, Selznick quickly bought the film rights to “Zenda” from MGM, with production starting in March 1937 and the final film premiering that September.
  • I love me some creative writing in the credits. This ain’t no film adaptation, it’s a “picturization of the celebrated novel”. There’s also a disclaimer that any resemblance to a “Great Royal Scandal” from the last century is purely coincidental. Anyone know what they’re alluding to?
  • As expected, Ronald Colman is quite dashing in this, and is clearly having fun playing scenes with himself. In previous posts, I’ve referenced David Niven succeeding Ronald Colman as Hollywood’s “Charming British Guy”, but I didn’t realize they were in a movie together. I imagine Niven took a lot of notes during filming.
  • C. Aubrey Smith is a bit of stunt casting: He had played the lead dual roles in a stage production of “Zenda” 40 years earlier, appearing in other productions through the years and joking that he “played every part except Princess Flavia.”
  • I was hoping for some old-school split screen effects when the two Rudolphs meet, and this film does not disappoint. And then this movie goes the extra mile and includes a wide shot of Colman shaking hands with himself! How did they do that?
  • We don’t see a lot of Raymond Massey in this blog. Most of his NFR representation comes from his later work squaring off with James Dean and briefly reprising his work as Lincoln. It’s fun watching him play a heavy, and I’m still holding out for his best villainous performance to make the NFR: Jonathan Brewster in “Arsenic and Old Lace”.
  • Douglas Fairbanks Jr. looks remarkably like his dad, yet differently enough that every time he turns up in one of these movies I think “Who’s that guy? He looks familiar.” Fairbanks wanted to play Rudolf, and was initially disappointed when offered the role of Rupert, until Fairbanks Sr. reminded him it’s one of the best written villains in all of literature.
  • Poor Mary Astor: always the third wheel, always the other woman. That being said, I like her character Antoinette; Michael’s mistress who helps Rudolf so that she can marry Michael. Sort of an “Everybody loves somebody” deal.
  • Well there’s a lot of spectacle going on, especially with this coronation. Makes sense, there was no live news coverage in 1937. If you wanted to see a coronation, you had to go to one.
  • I love when Rudolph really leans into the king stuff, especially in his early scenes with Flavia where he berates Fritz for the fun of it. I actually laughed out loud at these scenes. Not bad for an 86 year old movie.
  • The conductor at the ball who gets increasingly frustrated at having to stop and start is played by Al Shean, uncle of the Marx brothers!
  • I questioned this movie’s reference to Florence Nightingale as anachronistic, but by 1897 Nightingale was already famous for her nursing achievements during the Crimean War. Side note: Despite having the Florence Nightingale Effect named after her, there is no evidence that she ever fell in love with one of her patients.
  • What is Rupert wearing in the last few scenes? He looks like one of the aliens from “Plan 9 from Outer Space”.
  • The presence of Douglas Fairbanks Jr. and the sword fight depicted on the poster led me to believe that there would be a lot more swashbuckling in this movie. Aside from the climactic sword fight between Rudolf and Rupert, my swash was hardly buckled at all. The weird thing about the sword fight is how much quippy dialogue there is throughout. Shouldn’t they save their energy for the actual fighting? Apparently I was not the only one disappointed by this fight scene; Selznick hated the original version and had the whole thing re-shot by an uncredited W. S. Van Dyke after production wrapped.
  • With the exception of some streamlining in the third act, this film of “Zenda” is very faithful to the book, including the downer ending in which Rudolf and Flavia don’t get together because of her obligation to marry the king. Oh come on! This all being said, that’s a great final shot of Rudolph literally riding off into the sunset. James Wong Howe, you’ve done it again!

Legacy 

  • “The Prisoner of Zenda” was a box office hit upon release, encouraging Selznick International Pictures to go big with one of their upcoming projects in pre-production at the time: an adaptation of the novel “Gone with the Wind“.
  • Selznick had plans to film the book’s sequel “Rupert of Hentzau” in the late 1940s with Joseph Cotten taking over the dual Rudolph roles, but the film never made it to production.
  • John Cromwell reunited with Raymond Massey for the 1940 biopic “Abe Lincoln in Illinois”. Cromwell spent the next decade making a number of historical pictures before being blacklisted in the early 1950s. He returned to New York and the theater, making only a handful of movies after the blacklist.
  • Always happy to crank out remakes of public domain IP, “Prisoner of Zenda” got two more major film adaptations after 1937. 1952’s version starred Stewart Granger and was virtually a shot-for-shot remake of the 1937 version (even using the same screenplay). The 1979 remake starred Peter Sellers and was a more broadly comedic version of the tale. As with many a later Sellers project, Peter’s on-set tyranny led to a forgettable, unfunny final product. All was forgiven, however, with the release of Sellers’ next film: “Being There“.
  • While no one remembers “The Prisoner of Zenda” either in novel or film form, the “commoner switches places with royalty” trope has echoed throughout pop culture; from “History of the World Part I” to “Dave”.
  • Oh, and apparently the crew outfits in “Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan” were inspired by the uniforms in this film. I…got nothing, I’m not a Trekkie. But this is the best excuse I’ve had to play that clip of Shatner shouting “Khaaaaan!”

#661) Two-Lane Blacktop (1971)

#661) Two-Lane Blacktop (1971)

OR “I’ve Seen Tires and I Seem Drained”

Directed by Monte Hellman

Written by Rudolph Wurlitzer and Will Corry

Class of 2012

The Plot: Two guys known only as the Driver and the Mechanic (James Taylor and Dennis Wilson) drive their souped-up 1955 Chevrolet 150 across country, earning quick cash in illegal drag races. In the process they pick up a free-spirited young woman (“The Girl” – Laurie Bird) and have brief, antagonistic encounters with an older man who drives a Pontiac GTO (Warren Oates). While everyone is stopped at a gas station in New Mexico, the Driver and Mechanic challenge GTO to a race to Washington D.C. What follows is either an artsy introspective meditation on isolation in modern America or the most boring race movie ever made.

Why It Matters: The NFR contextualizes the film within “a spate of innovative, low-budget films by young filmmakers influenced by European directors” throughout the early ’70s. An essay by writer Sam Adams is a deep-dive into the film’s subtext.

But Does It Really?: Sometimes this blog teaches me something about myself, and today that something is that I really don’t care for the counterculture film movement of the late ’60s/early ’70s. There are people who love “Two-Lane Blacktop” and compare it favorably to the European art house movies that inspired it; I am not one of those people. What many find profound and insightful, I found just plain uninteresting. I suspect like so many other movies of its time this is another “You had to be there” kind of movie: My 2023 viewpoint just can’t get into what this movie was trying to tell a 1971 audience. “Two-Lane Blacktop” makes the list as an underground cult movie with a strong reputation amongst hardcore cinephiles, and therefore earns its NFR designation, but just barely in my humble opinion.

Everybody Gets One: Monte Hellman’s film career started, as so many others have, under the guidance of Roger Corman. In addition, Roger’s brother Gene Corman produced Hellman’s first movie: 1959’s “Beast from Haunted Cave“. Hellman made a series of low-budget “head” films in the late 1960s that starred the likes of Jack Nicholson and Warren Oates. Hellman met producer Michael Laughlin by chance and agreed to direct “Two-Lane Blacktop” based on a script owned by Laughlin, which was almost entirely thrown out and re-written except for, according to Hellman, “the title and the idea of a race.”

Seriously, Oscars?: No Oscar love for “Two-Lane Blacktop”, but Warren Oates managed to get a few Supporting Actor nominations from the New York Film Critics Circle and the National Society of Film Critics.

Other notes 

  • Perhaps the surest sign of the film’s low-budget: your two leads are musicians in their first (and ultimately final) film performances. While this is James Taylor’s sole NFR appearance, Dennis Wilson can be seen playing drums with his fellow Beach Boys in “The T.A.M.I. Show“, which I still consider one of the greatest movies on this list. Neither one of them is that great an actor, but it works in the context of these two loners who live in their own world.
  • “Two-Lane Blacktop” made some things very clear to me from the get-go. From its earliest moments, there’s an “Easy Rider” vibe to the whole movie (minus the soundtrack), which led to my ultimately-confirmed theory that this film was Universal’s attempt at their own counterculture hit in the wake of “Easy Rider”. The other major point came to me in the pre-credits sequence: an extended, dialogue-free scene of the Driver and Mechanic in a drag race. Right before the credits started I turned to my viewing partner and said, “I think this is what the whole movie will be like”. I hate it when I’m right.
  • Let’s see, what do I actually like about this movie? Well, there’s excellent use of natural lighting throughout. Shout out to the film’s cinematographer Gregory Sandor, who for union reasons couldn’t be credited as such, instead being billed as a “Photographic Advisor”.
  • It’s so weird hearing James Taylor say “fuck”. I got nothing else to say about that, it’s just so weird.
  • The other thing this movie has going against it for me: car talk. So much car talk. This movie might as well be in a foreign language.
  • In order to truly appreciate Warren Oates’ work in this movie, you have to have seen or at least be aware of his previous typecasting. Oates was primarily a western actor, often playing the henchman of whoever the main villain was. “Two-Lane” was a chance for Oates to play a more substantial, contemporary part. On its own I found the character a bit grating, but with more context I can start to understand why many critics singled out Oates and his performance in their reviews.
  • That’s a young Harry Dean Stanton (credited as H.D. Stanton) as the cowboy that GTO picks up, and who subsequently tries to pick up GTO, wink wink nudge nudge.
  • I couldn’t help but think of all the other car-related movies that could have made the NFR instead of this one. Where’s “Smokey and the Bandit”? “Duel”? “The Fast and the Furious”? “The Love Bug”? “Driving Miss Daisy”?
  • I know I complain a lot about movies where “nothing happens” and I tried to give this movie the benefit of the doubt, but man “Two-Lane” really tested my patience. It’s like they cut out the actual scenes and left the outtakes in the final film. I’m sure in 1971 it was still revolutionary to see a movie where people sit in silence for long passages, but my 2023 sensibility needed more. And before you say “You just didn’t get it,” rest assured I got it, and I did not care for it.
  • Oh my god, how did this movie make racing look so boring? I’ve seen senate races that were faster than this!
  • Coca-Cola products are all over the place in this movie. Did Coke pay Universal for all these shoutouts? Fun Fact: 1971 was the year Coke first aired their “Hilltop” ad, aka the Don Draper “I’d like to buy the world a Coke” commercial.
  • During my viewing, I predicted that the film would just end randomly, and I would say “That’s it?” Turns out “Two-Lane” has one of the more original final shots in a movie: As the Chevy drives off into the distance, the film appears to break and deteriorate before our eyes, leaving us with the final image of a blank screen. Points for originality, but for me this was too little too late.
  • Well, there was a two-lane blacktop in this movie. I have to admit they delivered on that.

Legacy 

  • In the lead-up to the release of “Two-Lane Blacktop”, Esquire magazine published the screenplay and prematurely declared the film “Our nomination for movie of the year”. Despite this prediction, and praise from critics, Universal head Lew Wasserman hated the film and pulled it from theaters after a brief run over the 4th of July weekend with zero advertising. After that, “Two-Lane Blacktop” remained unavailable to the viewing public, but started gaining an almost mythical stature amongst those who actually saw it.
  • For many years “Two-Lane Blacktop” didn’t get a video release due to a rights issue with the film’s use of The Doors’ song “Moonlight Drive”, exacerbated by Universal’s general disinterest in releasing the film. In 1999, video distributor Anchor Bay Entertainment (which specialized in releasing cult movies) was able to strike a deal with Universal and the surviving members of The Doors and got “Two-Lane Blacktop” a proper video release. A 2007 Criterion release on DVD helped earn the film a further re-evaluation. I borrowed the 2007 DVD from my local library for this write-up! Support your local library!
  • Monte Hellman reunited with Warren Oates and Laurie Bird for his next movie: 1974’s “Cockfighter”, which was even less successful than “Two-Lane Blacktop”. In addition to directing, Hellman was the second-unit director on the original “RoboCop” and an associate producer on “Reservoir Dogs”. Hellman’s last film was the short “Vive l’amour”, released posthumously in 2013.
  • James Taylor allegedly hated working on this film and has claimed never to have seen the movie, though he did reunite with the original Chevrolet 150 in a 2018 episode of “Jay Leno’s Garage”. Taylor’s acting career consists mostly of TV appearances as himself, including one of my favorite “Simpsons” guest spots ever. “I’m gonna play, and you’re gonna float there and like it!”
  • Journalist Brock Yates cited “Two-Lane Blacktop” as an influence on his annual Cannonball Baker Sea-To-Shining Sea Memorial Trophy Dash, aka Cannonball Run. Weirdly, the first Cannonball Run was in May 1971, two months before the film hit theaters. Whatever, it’s still as good an excuse as I’ll ever get to reference the “Cannonball Run” movie on this blog.

Listen to This: Dennis Wilson (along with the other Beach Boys) appears on the National Recording Registry via their landmark album “Pet Sounds“. Surprisingly, James Taylor has yet to make it onto the NRR, though he did write one of the songs (“You Can Close Your Eyes“) on Linda Ronstadt’s album “Heart Like a Wheel”, a 2013 NRR inductee.

For Your NFR Consideration: Castro’s Rep Sheet

This photo was created for Variety’s article about Rep. Castro’s list.

Sometimes I wonder if after 35 years, any Members of Congress still care about the preservation of American film and/or the National Film Registry they helped create. Thankfully, we’ve got Representative Joaquin Castro carrying the torch over in Texas’s 20th congressional district. On August 15th (this year’s deadline for NFR nominations), Rep. Castro wrote an open letter to Librarian of Congress Dr. Carla Hayden and the National Film Preservation Board nominating 27 films for NFR consideration, compiled by the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. On the heels of his successful campaign to get “Selena” on the list two years ago and “The Ballad of Gregorio Cortez” last year; Castro is going for the three-peat with his nominations, all of which are either by Latino filmmakers, about the Latino experience, or both. I’m glad Rep. Castro is out there shining his spotlight on the NFR, and particularly films by Latino artists, which make up less than 3% of the films currently on the Registry.

I’m not going to go through every film one by one; you can peruse the list yourself. But I do want to write down some of my initial takeaways about this selection.

  • Castro’s list isn’t presented in any particular order, which leads me to believe that Gregory Nava’s 1995 film “My Family” is Castro’s top choice by virtue of being listed first. Nava already has two films on the NFR – “El Norte” and the aforementioned “Selena” – and a third wouldn’t seem out of place. Plus “My Family” has Edward James Olmos, who appears in five movies already on the NFR! If betting on the NFR was legitimate, I’d put some money down on “My Family” joining the class of 2023.
  • The 27 films are a good sampling of Latino filmmaking, with comedies, dramas, documentaries, and even a sci-fi film highlighting various Latino experiences in America throughout the years. Among the more recognizable titles are “Frida” (2002), “The Milagro Beanfield War” (1988), “Maria Full of Grace”, “Up in Smoke” (1978), and “A Better Life” (2011). Directors represented include Alfonso Arau, Aurora Guerrero, Patricia Riggen, María Ripoll, Mariano Barroso and…Robert Redford? Oh right, I forgot he directed “The Milagro Beanfield War”.
  • It’s interesting to note that of these 27 films, a majority of them were made after 2000. This is no doubt in correlation with the rise of independent filmmaking, which is unfortunately still the only way most filmmakers of color can get their films made and their stories told.
  • I’m embarrassed to admit that I have not seen any of these films (though the person in front of me on a plane a few months ago was watching “Frida”, so I got the gist of it). At first I thought I had seen Eugenio Derbez’s “Instructions Not Included”, but then I realized I was thinking of the Aubrey Plaza time-travel movie “Safety Not Guaranteed”. Two very different movies. From this list, 2010’s “La Mission” piques my interest. Not only is it set in San Francisco in the late 2000s (aka my college years), but it was directed by Peter Bratt and starring his brother Benjamin. We love to see more “Law & Order” alumni on the list!
  • In addition to appearing in a few of these movies, Edward James Olmos directs two of them: the 1992 crime drama “American Me”, and the 2006 HBO movie “Walkout”. Castro will not rest until every Edward James Olmos movie has made the NFR. Next year: “Beverly Hills Chihuahua”!
  • Shoutout to Chris Weitz, whose 2011 Oscar-nominated film “A Better Life” is up for consideration. If it makes the cut, Weitz will be the third generation of his family to make the NFR, after his mother Susan Kohner and her mother Lupita Tovar.
  • As much I hate to nitpick, I question the eligibility of Castro’s second pick: Alfonso Arau’s 1992 hit “Like Water for Chocolate”. From what I can gather, this was an entirely Mexican production. Heck, it was Mexico’s official submission for the Oscar’s Foreign Language category. Usually the NFR is willing to look the other way if an international film was at least co-financed by an American company, but all signs point to “Like Water for Chocolate” being ineligible for this list.
  • I submitted my own 2023 nominations back in March, so I didn’t get to include any of Castro’s choices on my own ballot. That being said I have previously nominated two of his 27 films: Julie Taymor’s “Frida” and Lou Adler’s “Up in Smoke”. I nominated “Frida” in a push to get more female-directed films on the list, and “Up in Smoke” because…come on, it’s Cheech & Chong! Cheech is already on the list, and who am I to break up the band?

As always, you can nominate films for NFR consideration. We’ve passed the deadline for 2023 (I’ll be posting my nominations post soon), but you can get a head start on 2024. Nominate here, check out their website’s list of films not yet on the list, and check out my own For Your Consideration page.

Happy Viewing,

Tony